Continuing the trend of political prosecutions posts
1. Without mentioning Russia, explain why Comey should be indicted?
2. In the indictment of Leticia James why is she being indicted when three of Trump‘s cabinet members have done the same thing and the career prosecutors in that district neglected to bring the case?
Replies to: Continuing the trend of political prosecutions posts
At least you acknowledge they are just continuing a trend started by Democrats.
Even Joe Biden publicly stated we couldn't trust the DOJ. Maybe we can work together to rid it of corruption.
I'll amend my post for stupidity like yours
(no message)
Can't clean up the system if you are in denial about basic facts.
(no message)
Noticed you are staying far from actual answers to my OP.
(no message)
An AI could answer you regarding Comey: He was idicted for lying to Congress & obstructing justice.
Regarding Leticia James, I did answer: Leticia James ran on the position of using selective prosecution to go after Trump, and now you think it is unjust to use selective prosecution to go after her. I agreed with you that they were just continuing the trend. I then suggested that we should cooperate to stop that. But, since you are willfully blind to the full trend, this obviously won't work. The trend you started will continue, and things will only get worse, as each side refuses to see their own fault.
Both cases are flimsy as hell…
Even with the truth social tweet to Pam Bondi, the Trumpers will deny that these are political retribution cases.
And now the WSJ confirmed that dementia Trump meant to post his "prosecute them" privately to Bondi
(no message)
How would a reporter confirm that?
(no message)
Trump is on record telling Bondi to prosecute
(no message)
Again, how would a reporter be able to confirm that Trump meant to post it privately?
Until people start to use their brains and ask these kinds of questions, they are completely vulnerable to MSM manipulation.
There is a story maybe read it thrn ask silly questions. Why do you deny the reporting?
(no message)
I don’t care if it was meant to be a private message…
That’s not relevant to me. What is relevant is that Bondi took action on two indictments after the message was sent. Care to defend that?