... on a text message, like those in the news lately, can be identified before becoming leaders of the Republican Party. Not that I am taking at face value, after all of the other hoaxes, that all, or most, of the persons included in the text were Republicans. Democrats, on the other hand, seem to embrace violence and hatred as one of their core virtues. Democrats embrace violence not only in words, they take violent action, and their violence is not on the fringe, it is at the core of their party.
The leading candite for Virginia governor is literally endorsing a man who espoused murder, and Democrats will elect her as governor.
Not just Democrats, Democrat leadership loves to repeat the phrase, “When they go low, we kick ‘em”. Even with that they report that their base is unhappy that they are not fighting and attacking enough. They literally use violence, not just speak violence, against federal officials attempting to enforce the law.
With Federal ICE agent being impeded, threatened, attacked, or shot at for more that 100 days in a row – can you guess which party those attackers are associated with, which party embraces them.
If Americans were being shot and killed day after day, weekend after weekend, in American cities, which party would you guess would be embracing the violence and refusing help to end it? If rioters and looters were killing Americans and attempting to burn American cities to the ground which party’s LEADERSHIP—not young texters—would you guess is embracing, supporting, and cheering on that death and destruction. The very top of Democrat LEADERSHIP, Kamala Harris, looked on as Americans were being killed and American cities were being destroyed and shed not a tear. Instead, she and the Democrats saw the violence as an opportunity to project and spew even more of their sadism. Kamala’s joy for the carnage was revealed when she said, “The violence wouldn’t stop and it shouldn’t stop.” Her pleasure in seeing the violence was confirmed when she contributed to an organization not to assist those harmed but to bail out the rioters. Democrats do not have to hide their vulgarities in secret text for fear of being shamed—that’s why they call them secret. Democrats will openly and proudly embrace violence and refuse to condemn it. When Democrats openly say, “I love to open my window to the smell of burning tires” they are embraced, not condemned.
The FBI is currently investigating a hunting stand with sight line to where Trump exits Air Force One at Florida airport.
The problem with this country is not the language, or actions, most Republicans reject, it is the language, and actions, most Democrats embrace.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Killings of Black people in Buffalo and Hispanics in El Paso…you just might want to rethink that creative thesis of yours, Kalc.
… and leaders before I rethink anything. You are flailing with your “likelihood” suppositions when we contrast that with what we KNOW Dems have applauded and OPENLY embraced.
Terrorism", which probabilistically results in violence against certain groups...here's an excerpt from the attached Wikipedia description of the phenomenon...
------------------------
According to this framework, originators deploy hostile rhetoric toward identified out-groups while avoiding explicit calls for violence. Amplifiers repeat and spread the messages, causing some receivers to internalize the content and take action once a personal threshold is reached. The rhetoric frequently frames targets as existential threats and may use coded, joking, or ambiguous references to violence; particularly within echo chamber environments, this repetition can stoke anger, contempt, and fear. Scholars describe the central dogma of stochastic terrorism as probabilistic: when hostile, dehumanizing, or threat-framed rhetoric is repeatedly amplified to mass audiences, it elevates the background risk of ideologically motivated violence by unknown individuals over time, even though who acts, when, and how remains indeterminate and uncoordinated.[1][2][12]
------------------------
Again...witness the motivations of those mass killers in Buffalo (against Black People)...and in El Paso (against Hispanics)...both of the perpetrators harbored deep hatred of those groups. Such chat groups can indeed push some unknown individuals "Over the Edge". Lesson:...don't engage in hateful speech...especially in mass/social media.
Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stochastic_terrorism