UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

(no message)

Were it not for the Wall Street Journal (hardly the liberal media), we might not know that the Trump family made $5 billion in ONE DAY because of its crypto scam.

Of course MAGA is cool with this because whatabout Hunter Biden or some shit.


Link: https://www.wsj.com/finance/currencies/trump-family-amasses-6-billion-fortune-after-crypto-launch-567faec5?gaa_at=eafs&gaa_n=AWEtsqfrLBCCxQ0OeUg-G7vZ5Stsyh7ib6_26neHXKEGAOu7nGL4YfmXS6y9CLw9Gyo%3D&gaa_ts=69037871&gaa_sig=UzuO9bqTvPCvNRIx2YTIbNzSCKzqVOdetjm

Tass and Pravda were "media" and they were vitally important to...something...alright.

The real story here is how any court allow this abuse of the discovery process?

Link: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/jack-smith-issued-subpoenas-targeting-more-than-400-republicans-in-arctic-frost-case-grassley-says/ar-AA1PrF40?ocid=BingNewsVerp

(no message)

(no message)

Protected Sleepy Joe. Lied about the George Floyd mostly peaceful protests. Continue to lie about what ICE is trying to accomplish. Keep vital info away from the public with these tranny shooters. No investigative follow up on the DJT shooter or the Charlie Kirk murder. That's your American MSM. Local media ain't much better.

Senate Intelligence Committee finding that the Trump campaign actively worked with Putin's Russia to win the 2016 election...i.e. no Hoax.

For whatever reason, you avoid proof that the MSM is right...and your sources are the ones who are knowingly lying to you.


Link: https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2023/02/tucker-carlson-text-messages-dominion-lawsuit-fox-news.html

perfect example of MAGAhats choosing to sidestep reality for Cult spin.

something that makes you feel better about your poor choices.

Straight-up corruption, cheered on by MAGA.

Link: https://www.wsj.com/finance/currencies/binance-trump-crypto-pardon-cz-changpeng-zhao-1007fde9?mod=hp_lead_pos7&utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

appeal to a conservative audience...hence, your preference for news.

Here's an excerpt from a Wiki review of the firm...
-----------------------
2017 to present
In November 2020, The New York Times published an article alleging that since 2017, when many of its "straight-news" reporting journalists were laid off, RealClearPolitics showed a pro-Trump turn with donations to its affiliated nonprofit increasing from entities supported by wealthy conservatives.[28] RCP executive editor Carl Cannon disputed the newspaper's allegations of a rightward turn, saying that he had solicited donations from both conservative and liberal donors, without them "buying coverage".[29] Several journalists who talked to The New York Times in 2020 said they never felt any pressure from the site's founders to bias their stories.[28] Cannon stated that RCP regularly publishes perspectives from both liberal and conservative publications, saying that "the simple fact is that the amount of liberal material published in RCP every week dwarfs the annual conservative content in The New York Times".[29] However, in 2016, the final RealClearPolitics national polling average before Election Day showed Hillary Clinton ahead by about 3 points (Clinton 46.8%, Trump 43.6%).[30]

The New York Times also said that "Real Clear became one of the most prominent platforms for elevating unverified and reckless stories about the president's political opponents, through a mix of its own content and articles from across conservative media..." and that for days after the election, "Real Clear Politics gave top billing to stories that reinforced the false narrative that the president could still somehow eke out a win."[28] Cannon responded by highlighting two articles suggesting that "Trump could somehow eke out a win" on RCP's front page by noting that 374 articles had been covered on its front page between the time of the election and The New York Times' article, including 16 articles from The New York Times itself.[29]

In 2016, RealClearInvestigations was launched,[31] backed by foundations associated with conservative causes, such as the Ed Uihlein Family Foundation and Sarah Scaife Foundation.[32] In 2019, the site published an article by a conservative author, Paul Sperry, containing the supposed name of a U.S. intelligence officer who blew the whistle on the Trump–Ukraine scandal.[32] The article's publication came as part of a month-long effort by Trump allies on media and social media to "unmask" the whistleblower, whose identity was kept confidential by the U.S. government, in accordance with whistleblower protection (anti-retaliation) laws.[32] Most publications declined to reveal the whistleblower's identity; Tom Kuntz, editor of RealClearInvestigations, defended the site's decision to publish the article.[32] Cannon stated that whistleblower protections did not ensure anonymity from journalism, instead guaranteeing protection from firing, prosecution, and professional punishment.[29]
--------------------

The NYT and WaPo still publish...and adhere to...their Journalistic Standards. No need to muddy the waters with questionable sources.

(no message)

(no message)

Ukraine's President?...you make poor choices. There is such a thing as "Right and Wrong"...

(no message)

(no message)

not notice?