Surprised that conorlarkin did not post this WaPo Classic
Replies to: Surprised that conorlarkin did not post this WaPo Classic
He’s afraid of the truth
(no message)
He can't handle the truth!
(no message)
Your link is to State TV. Why not post link to Washington Post?
And there is a reason many of the paper’s journalists left.
They felt their freedom of expression was being suppressed.
Link: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2025/10/29/shutdown-snap-elections-food-stamp-government/
Same difference. Badmouthing Fox doesn't change the position.
If you have such little respect for WaPo, why is it a favorite of yours?
Same difference? Your Mothership paid out $780 million for trafficking falsehoods re 2020 election.
Since Bezos' cowardice to Trump took effect. I was 50/50 between NY Times and Washington Post.
Now 85/15. Washington Post is still 100x better source of news vs the twisted and compromised sources you soak up --- reflected in your daily posts.
Same tired talking point. Get new material
(no message)
Irrelevant because the story facts are the same.
(no message)
Why do you deflect rather than address the OpEd? We know why.
(no message)
Deflect? I find the OpEd a thoughtful and balanced piece. Neither you nor GOAT read it.
(no message)
Yes. And your response sheds no light on why you did it.
(no message)
Hensou (AKA..."Aragoto", or "GOAT") refuses to deny that he's the same Person who signed on to
this Forum with those Usernames...thinks that those "Personas" will fool everyone...he's terrified of admitting he's been a liar by Omission all this time...what a sad existence.
Why do you keep repeating this lie?
Here are some links in which he's repeatedly denied exactly what you're accusing him of not doing. These are all within the last year.
Will you commit to discontinuing this lie? Or will you continue to pollute the board with it?
https://forum.uhnd.com/forum/index.php?action=display&forumid=2&msgid=272110
https://forum.uhnd.com/forum/index.php?action=display&forumid=2&msgid=269168
https://forum.uhnd.com/forum/index.php?action=display&forumid=2&msgid=264862
https://forum.uhnd.com/forum/index.php?action=display&forumid=2&msgid=228254
https://forum.uhnd.com/forum/index.php?action=display&forumid=2&msgid=228206
"Hensou/Aragoto/GOAT" treats Usernames as "Personas", which is not uncommon on social media...
I've asked him...with his current Username of "Hensou"... multiple times to answer a simple Yes/No question..."Have You...the human being you are who logged onto this Forum...ever used the Username "Aragoto" to sign in/"...he has never provided that simple Y/N response. Instead, he says He IS not "Aragoto", which is consistent with someone who treats a Username as a "Persona"...i.e. his current Username is what defines him on this forum. Check it out for yourself...btw, I"m not the only one who has figured this out...none of us is lying...it is the current "Hensou" who is lying by failing to answer the "Shibboleth Question" that would resolve the issue.
Don't be fooled..."Hensou" has no honor, or respect for others.
He has answered. You wonder why he won't continue to answer the same question?
(no message)
Do you discount what I just posted as impossible?
(no message)
Every time you use the GOAT accusation you lose the argument.
The WaPo article does not encourage the dems to extend the shutdown.
Or, it means that I read the OpEd from the original source. You clearly did not.
The piece does NOT blame Schumer or the Democrats for the shutdown, "holding America hostage for a month" as you and FOX framed it.
Rather, the piece asserts that the timing has changed, meaning the political calculations have changed.
From the original source:
October 29, 2025 at 6:54 p.m. EDT
"A Turning Point in the Government Shutdown"
Piecemeal bills are a waste of time. Just fund the whole government.
One reason the partial government shutdown has dragged on for nearly a month is because most Americans have felt no discernable impact on their daily life. That’s starting to change. This weekend, federal food stamps are scheduled to stop going out. Around 42 million people, or 1 in 8 Americans, receive benefits from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.
This pain point, combined with three other dynamics, should help hasten an end to the shutdown as early as next week by making Democrats blink.
First, the open enrollment period for purchasing health insurance starts on Saturday. Many people will experience sticker shock when they see how much their premiums are about to go up. Democrats will be able to claim they got their point across about the need to rescue Obamacare by extending subsidies that are set to expire.
Second, Democrats are favored to win most of next Tuesday’s off-year elections. If they prevail in the New Jersey and Virginia governor’s races, as well as the New York mayor’s race, Democratic leaders could save face by claiming that the people sent a loud message to President Donald Trump. Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries are both New Yorkers who fear the Mamdani wing of the party.
Schumer has allowed the shutdown to drag on because he’s worried about fending off a primary challenger in 2028, and he’s still smarting from blowback he got from angry liberals after he agreed to fund the government this spring. Electoral wins can offer a pretext to claim vindication, or at least quietly give permission for a few of his members to break ranks.
Third, federal public employee unions, a core Democratic constituency, are losing patience. The American Federation of Government Employees, which represents more than 800,000 federal and D.C. government workers, said in a statement Monday that the shutdown is unacceptably hurting its members: “It’s time to pass a clean continuing resolution and end this shutdown today,” said AFGE National President Everett Kelley. “No half measures, and no gamesmanship.”
Kelley’s message shows why it’s untenable for Democrats to insist on a piecemeal approach to fund certain programs, such as food stamps, while keeping federal workers furloughed. Air traffic controllers, for instance, just missed their first full paycheck of the shutdown, even though they’re required to keep working.
Senate Democrats mostly stuck together last Thursday to block a bill that would have ensured the troops and other categories of essential employees keep getting paid, but now they’re insisting on a standalone bill to keep SNAP funded. They’re also accusing Trump of not tapping into emergency funds to keep the payments going, even as they’ve criticized him for diverting funds toward programs they care less about.
A variety of mitigating factors could prevent SNAP cuts from ratcheting up the pressure to reach a deal. More than two dozen blue states and D.C. sued on Tuesday in a bid to force the Trump administration to keep sending payments. They drew a sympathetic liberal judge in Boston, who has scheduled a hearing for Thursday. Other states are moving to limit the fallout: Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin (R) declared a state of emergency and said he’ll use surplus funds to cover food stamps through November.
Save the debate for another day about whether too many people qualify for food stamps, which have become significantly more generous over the years. Keeping the government open should be separated from policy disputes about how to spend taxpayer money. It is wrong that Democrats have held the government hostage for a month in hopes of extending costly Obamacare subsidies, just as it was for Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) to shut down the government in 2013 for 16 days in a bid to defund the Affordable Care Act altogether.
Negotiations can always fall apart, but the calendar could help: Both chambers are supposed to be out on recess the week after next for Veterans Day, which might help induce a deal by next Friday.
The right answer is to reopen the government with a clean funding bill, ideally for a full year, to get food stamps flowing and federal workers back in the office, and then have a debate about ACA subsidies. Democrats openly acknowledge that they refuse to do this because it would mean giving up their leverage. If they persist, it could mean families start to go hungry.
I clearly did. It calls for the dems to stop the bullshit and find a way to stop the shutdown.
It suggests smaller bills. You just badmouthed WaPo by saying everyone is leaving, then you adore them by twisting their essential message.
"'Washington Post' Editorials Omit a Key Disclosure: Bezos' Financial Ties"...
...an excerpt from the linked article...
---------------------
A year ago, in explaining why he had blocked the publication of an endorsement of Democratic presidential nominee, Kamala Harris, Washington Post owner, and Amazon founder, Jeff Bezos conceded that "When it comes to the appearance of conflict, I am not an ideal owner of "The Post".
On at least three occsions in the past two weeks, an official Post editorial has taken on matters in which Bezos has a financial or corporate interest without noting his stake. In each case, the Post's official editorial line landed in sync with it's owner's financial interests.
In the most recent instance, the ost defended President Trump's jaw-dropping moves to raze the East Wing of the White House without any of the typically required studies or consultations as he seeks to build a vast ballroom. "Trump's undertaking is a shot across the bow of NIMBYs everywhere," the Post wrote in its editorial, which first appeared online Saturday.
---------------------
WaPo editorials reflect Bezos' personal...financial...views...not the WaPo staff's...
Link: https://www.npr.org/2025/10/28/nx-s1-5587932/washington-post-editorials-omit-a-key-disclosure-bezos-financial-ties