My two favorite words: Not Guilty
Replies to: My two favorite words: Not Guilty
The Gestapo filed charges over lunch meat? Weak.
(no message)
You misspelled "jury nullification."
He was obviously guilty. The jury just decided to nullify the application of the law in this case, as is their right. Do you support jury nullification?
So quick on the uptake Ned. Nothing gets past you.
Per my reply below to Emerson Lake & Palmer, a jury is the final check ‘n balance that protects one’s liberty from Government overreaching.
Would you feel differently if it had been a grinder?
(no message)
Mine is Justice. Less myopic.
(no message)
And the jury has spoken. They heard the case. You did not.
(no message)
We all saw the video. A picture is worth a thousand words. DC jury. Yet another shocker.
(no message)
How about the offender blowing a soap bubble that “Strikes” the ICE Officer?…you embarrass yourself
with regularity.
Should the guy have done jail time for lobbing a sub at the ICE dude?
(no message)
The ICE dude is a Federal agent. Not a shopping mall security guard.
What do you think would happen if you tried that trick on your local county PD? You think he would buy you candy and flowers? It doesn't matter if it's a brick, spit, or a Subway, it's assault of a Federal officer. What would you do if this coward threw it at you? TDS has literally destroyed the moral compass of the anti-Trumpers. If this twit threw a sandwich at a Capitol police officer on J6, I guarantee he would have been jailed.
And much worse than throwing subs was happening on January 6th
and you know it. You really should work on your Trump psychosis. You people truly are blind.
I’m not saying it was the right thing to do, nor would I stoop to such a level…
I want to know if you think lobbing a sub at the ICE dude warrants jail time.
We keep forgetting that NYC and DC prosecutions should be heard in North Dakota.
Trial by jury is a fundamental right. The jury is the ultimate check’n balance to protect an individual’s liberty from the power of the State.
In this instance, a unanimous jury was not convinced the Government met its demanding burden of proof.
Yield.
You assume innocence for a living. I have the greater valor of objectivity
(no message)
Yes, you are nothing if not objective.
(no message)
I don't know how the evidence against the guy could not be greater. What a world the
liberals are trying to make.
The DC jury was convinced he was a 6 foot hero…
(no message)
Yes he was totally guilty…of throwing a sandwich. Put him away!
(no message)
Way to minimize a submarine attack…
(no message)
If I made the same remark the post would be erased.
Pure irrelevant snark, prof. Illogical as well.
And rightly so, you’re a prick
(no message)
Using your words. And we all admire your objective valor.
Or valorous objectivity.
Snark is snark prof.
And you need Admin’s protection. Everyone knows this.
(no message)