From Google AI: "Yes, the Roman Catholic Church teaches that personhood begins at conception. The Church holds that a new human life is present from the moment of conception, is created by God, and is due the respect and rights of a person from that instant. This belief is the foundation for its consistent stance against abortion, which it considers the taking of an innocent human life."
On another front, Ty, since I know you never change your mind even when confronted with irrefutable facts (like HCQ+), are you suggesting Pope Francis was okay with abortion at some point after conception?
Intentionally taking this life outside of acting to sVd another life directly is a grave and mortal sin.
The enemies of the Church wish to confuse by getting catholics to buy the idea of life being defined as a “person”, and then getting lost in the weeds of the definition of person.
A “personality” requires a functional brain to develop - an organ, like all of the others,that an embryo has not developed yet.
Human life does not depend on the presence of a personality (which is implied in the term person), because its presence and value dies not hinge in having a specific developed organ - in this caee the brain.
Human life. Is present when the embryo forms at conception and is imbued with a soul.
My experience had been that those misrepresenting the Church on abortion often have a lot a personal stake in the issue. But you can’t argue with God Nd the Church doctrine on this is infallible snd unchanging - even liberal Pope Francis strongly upheld this.
Even liberal Pope Francis was very vlear on this.
(no message)
The Ultimate Heresy.
(no message)
goes for Ned...
Note that there are many other publications that have verified it as well...even if they don't like what they heard...like the website "Where Peter Is" that I've posted, which also quotes other Pontiffs making the same determination.
Know that I make a habit of checking my assertions before posting...you never know when the Board's 'Anal-Retentive', Hensou (AKA "Aragoto", or "GOAT") might come out of hiding.
People who have the ability to use logic understand this.
You didn't answer my question (just like you repeatedly refused to answer how Dr. Fareed successfully treated hundreds of patients with HCQ+): Is it your position Pope Francis was okay with abortion up to a certain point?
...contrary to what the Pope has said and expressed and contrary to what the church teaches and believes.
I don't care about Tyrone's views in the least as I know where they originate and what his mission is here.
I do care about a clown deliberately misrepresenting the words of the Pope on a board even unofficially affiliated with Notre Dame. That's the limit of my concern.
Those too stupid to understand what Tyrone is doing here...are why he is here.
passed away this April, and in that time never retracted or amended what he said...i.e. "Therefore, there is a living human being, I do not say a person because this is debated, but a living human being.".
As to the claim that it was an "off the cuff" slip of the tongue...that's not true either, no more than his other comments regarding "....a living human being...". Clearly you don't want to invalidate that part of his comments, so just stop making stuff up...it ruins a reasoned discussion.
btw, just two days ago I posted a complete article from the website "Where Peter Is" that took issue with Francis' "Personhood" comment...which, btw, is an example of open Critical Thinking (see the link)...and found that Pope Francis wasn't the only Pontiff to hold and maintain that position....here (again) is the concluding paragraph from that article...
Link: https://forum.uhnd.com/forum/index.php?action=display&forumid=2&msgid=273902
(no message)
Nothing will stop him from lying about this. His main purpose is to misuse Catholic teaching to support the Democrat Platform. The Democrat Platform is the source of his "morality," not Church doctrine.
right of all women to choose whether or not to carry a pregnancy they never wanted to term.
With that in mind, I'll repeat my question..."While a woman CAN reproduce, MUST she do so under ANY and ALL circumstances?"...Keep in mind that the RCC sanctions the killing of other persons, even totally innocent debated persons in "Just War" circumstances, provided certain conditions are met and that "Prudential Judgement" has been used.
If a woman "chooses" to abort I "feel" that she should so before the fetus is viable.
As to when "life" begins.... that seems like a very arbitrary "legal" decision.
There have been societies in which infanticide was legal.
Link: https://ebrary.net/89446/history/history_infanticide_cultures_time_periods#google_vignette
(no message)
(no message)