(no message)
Link: https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8DwboP3/
(no message)
Or would you prefer I focus on the mayor elect of Seattle, who makes Mamdani look like a capitalistic pig.
(no message)
NYC is rolling downhill in this direction and Mamdani will accelerate the pace.
(no message)
The D is doing so so much better today than it was prior to the 2013 Chapter 9 purging.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Iowa farmers voted for it. It’s a national issue. Rent stabilization is a local issue he gets wrong every time he posts on it.
...10X increase in 'Productivity' of CEOs vs. Avg. Workers?...Really?
A 2% tax increase on NYC millionaires could produce ~$4B in revenue for landlord credits so that units are repaired and livable...not empty...along with other benefits for low income residents...while those tax payers remain millionaires...billionaires...or even trillionaires.
Link: https://www.epi.org/publication/ceo-pay/
Or would the City do the upgrades themselves?
And what if maintenance costs themselves can’t be covered by the “stabilized” rents?
And what happens if CEOs simply relocate out of town?
And… gosh there are so so many questions about how having the government introject itself into the marketplace.
Maybe the government should simple take over housing in general?
Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khrushchevka
needed upgrades.
I acknowledge that housing in NYC is abysmal. My son lived there for a few years on a Wall Steet investment banker's salary and his place was a dump. I just have severe doubts about any government intervention in markets. It always inflates the costs... like with funding higher Ed.
btw, I have a relative who has spent their entire adult life living and working in NYC for a major company...that relative is alone now, living off a decent pension among life long friends and neighbors...there is no way that relative could afford the skyrocketing rents...surely, the super wealthy can afford to do SOMETHING for such people. The program I mentioned should help keep the landlords of NYC off the bread lines while allowing residents to have a roof over their heads.
intense than 1978.
The personal sacrifices to reach the CEO level of a Fortune 1000 company are beyond what most are willing to do.
(no message)
Or should the government have an agency of elite academics who would “determine” the “appropriate” salaries for every job in the country?
Or best of all… to each according to his or her or whatever’s “needs”
And it either goes to them or the owners.
As for college coach salaries....that is an abomination. But the NCAA is a bigger abomination.
God forbid some of its money serve the educational mission of the schools.
...from the Knight Commission...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knight_Commission
Link: https://www.knightcommission.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/kcia_cla_projections__2023.pdf
(no message)
The idea that being CEO of GM today is ten times harder than it was in 1970 is asinine.