Below are the names. This will be interesting, because they recently selected Harold Freaking Baines, who had a lower career W.A.R. than all of the players on this year's list.
We've had the Bonds/Clemens debate here. Arguably, Sheffield is in or out depending on whether or not you argued the same way for those two. The others are interesting choices. Personally, I can see the committee choosing Murphy and Mattingly. I don't know how they will view the rest, and the P.E.D. guys are probably going to hinge on who is selected for the committee.
Barry Bonds
Roger Clemens
Gary Sheffield
Jeff Kent
Dale Murphy
Carlos Delgado
Don Mattingly
Fernando Valenzuela
Had a great career when the Braves were the 90's Arizona Cardinals.
Mattingly is one of the best pure hitters the game has ever scene. Also cannot ignore his nine gold gloves. It sucks what happened to his back.
Great for a shorter duration due to injury. He also had the misfortune of a peak career right before the P.E.D. era (like Murphy) and right before the Yankees became a dynasty. Strongly believe his candidacy would be different had he produced the same way for those 90's Yankees.
(no message)
Like Pete, he associated with gamblers (probably bet on his own games, although that wasn't ever proven). Plus, like Pete, he was an asshole that nobody liked. He was voted into the Hall of Fame in 1994, after he was dead.
(no message)
(no message)
Not only did Barry have the power (admittedly enhanced), but his eye/hand coordination was HOF worthy.
(no message)
.408 Batting Average, 42 strikeouts, 193 OPS+, 41 Stolen Bases (caught ZERO times), 19 triples....Wow!!!
Sadly, Ty Cobb was playing at the time, so he didn't win M.V.P.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
There is no universe in which Clemens and Bonds should not be in the Hall. Add as many asterisks as you want.
Of the rest, I think Kent is a yes.
And if Mattingly gets in but not Hernandez, the building should be burned to the ground. Just one man's opinion.
they joined the party.
List their accomplishments, teams, etc. And then note that significant evidence exists that they used performance-enhancing drugs late in their careers. I don't have the answer, but I do know that P.E.D. users are absolutely already in. I don't like Bagwell and Piazza and Ortiz having plaques but Bonds and Clemens not.
I'm not wild about Kent, simply because his best seasons coincided with Bonds behind him in the lineup giving him way better pitches to hit.
Agree with you on Mattingly.
I hated Roger Clemens. But he was one of the top 2 or 3 pitchers of my lifetime.
And Bonds's 2004 season was one of the most dominant ones a hitter has ever had.
Put them in. And McGwire and Sosa. But make note.
Glad I took my kids there before this became front and center. Have no interest any longer...
Mattingly was a great hitter but he also was a great fielder. He had to be a star among some awful Yankee teams. I'd put Bonds and Clemens in too. Murphy was very good. Not sure on the others. I am pissed off that the voters didn't put Yogi Berra in on the first ballot who was considered one of the greatest catchers of all time, when you include his bat, clutch efforts and 10 world championships. They put Ozzie Smith in on the first ballot and though he was a wizard in the field. he couldn't hit.
(no message)
His first eligibility for H.O.F. voting came in 1999 right after the power explosion of the 90's that quickly watered down his accomplishments compared to recent power hitters, and we now know why.
(no message)