Two malicious prosecutions dismissed
The only thing that really provides a check on the Trump administration's venality is its stupidity. These are dumb people.
Link: https://www.cnn.com/2025/11/24/politics/james-comey-letitia-james-indictments-dismissed
Replies to: Two malicious prosecutions dismissed
A malicious dismissal. :)
(no message)
Cult member!
(no message)
There’s a reason DOJ never had career prosecutors take a loyalty test. Until this Administration.
(no message)
“I know only the best people!”
(no message)
Another idiot judge, the rulings will not stand of course.
"Currie, however, denied a request to bar the Justice Department from seeking to indict them again under a lawfully appointed prosecutor." Do you ever read the articles?
There's a reason prior DOJ Prosecutors refused to take those cases...and it had to do with a lack of
Merit...
btw, there are a couple of cases against DJT that were dismissed "Without Prejudice" just waiting for Trump when he leaves office. They have to do with Jan. 6th's Insurrection, and Mar-a-Lago government documents. Do you remember them?
Not defined as "malicious" by the judge.
"The judge tossed out the cases “without prejudice,” leaving open the possibility that the cases against Comey and James can be brought again alleging the same conduct."
Defined as "malicious" by me, so thanks for your pointless input.
(no message)
That was actually helpful input. I thought you were saying they were dismissed as malicious.
(no message)
I thought the same thing.
Chris doesn't think he has an obligation to provide factual commentary and I suppose he is right. More than a tad hypocritical though in my opinion.
My point is that your use of the term "malicious" is pointless as you have no standing in this case.
Your hysterical descriptor is disqualified by fact.
Wait - are you saying that a message board poster has no standing in a federal case?!
You know, you might have a point.
Just remember you're talking to a World Class, Anal-Retentive Nitpicker...it'll only get worse ;-)
(no message)
Truer words and such
(no message)
Then don't make a federal case out of your descriptor. Science!
(no message)
Barring the Trump admin's pension for effing things up, do you feel the govt has a strong case?
(no message)
I think you meant penchant not pension.
(no message)
Now you have him confused, again
(no message)