Nigel, a question about the “new” weed - far more potent versiondesigned in labs
Far more dangerous, psychosis. Inducing, etc. Addictive. “Not your father’s weed”
It’s becoming so widespread that long standing MJ states now reconsidering legality because of this.
What’s your perspective on this problem - do you even consider it a problem. Were you aware?
I am not a user (actually never), so I realize my perspective is biased one way and want to hear the impressions of someone with a different persoective.
Replies to: Nigel, a question about the “new” weed - far more potent versiondesigned in labs
I really don't know a lot about it
I stay away from the newer, more exotic and more potent offerings. I know there are a lot of people who are big proponents of the psychotic offerings but I have no interest.
Timely note, as just today news has broken that Trump wants to move forward on rescheduling. There have been only about 1,000 false starts before today so we'll see.
To me rescheduling is a no-brainer. No way cannabis deserves regulated alongside heroin and LSD - make it Schedule III and move forward. I know many disagree.
What are you toking about here?
If you're referring to the isolation of specific cannabinoids, like non-psychoactive CBD, CBG, CBC, CBN; I support this. There is some early research with these compounds that is promising for medical uses.
The desire to concentrate or increase THC amounts is no different than higher alcohol or caffeine beverages, IMO. Always a market for people chasing the tail of the dragon. The danger is course is people without the high tolerance dosing themselves more than they can handle.
We need to get our arms around this as well as "Energy Drinks."
I'm sorry, but huge cans of sweet beverages that have 300 (or more) milligrams of caffeine marketed as "pre-workout" or whatever need to be stamped out.
Consent Management