(no message)
...from the attached announcement...
-----------------
Today, Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger announced the results of the Risk Limiting Audit of Georgia's presidential contest, which upheld and reaffirmed the original outcome produced by the machine tally of votes cast. Due to the tight margin of the race and the principles of risk-limiting audits, this audit was a full manual tally of all votes cast. The audit confirmed that the original machine count accurately portrayed the winner of the election.
-----------------
Btw, the Audit found that contrary to Mr. Trump's claim of 5,000 votes being cast on behalf of deceased voters, the actual number was 4...so clearly, Donald Trump tried to overturn a free and fair election. Hopefully, he'll get his day in court to try and explain the many lies he perpetrated to that end.
Link: https://sos.ga.gov/news/historic-first-statewide-audit-paper-ballots-upholds-result-presidential-race
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
The poll workers didn’t sign them properly.
Cancel the results!
You probably think this is a "whatabout Chris94" post, though, and are now putting me on ignore again.
(no message)
Prevention of fraud is why ballots are signed by reps from both major parties, at least in my state. This story relates to hundreds of thousands of ballots not certified by proper signatures. They could have come from anywhere.
Worse, not requiring an ID to vote increases chances for fraud. Can you and I agree that those two things increase the chances for voter fraud? I'm not trying to get you to concede anything other than that you have some common sense.
in a state that went for Biden by just under 12,000 votes. And you want to accuse others of trying to mislead?
(no message)
Just saying nothing would've changed doesn't really do much for your argument. What is the point of the law mandating that the tapes be signed by a poll worker to validate the rolls if it can just be tossed aside when it doesn't happen? And when it happens in 36 of 37 precincts and affects over 40% of the vote in a democrat stronghold in a swing state, you are trying to claim it is us that are getting bamboozled with this revelation? That is a systemic problem, not just a mere accidental one, and one that always seem to happen in democrat strongholds.
And if it is no big deal, why did the attorney admit they have a new SOP?
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Your attempt to mischaracterize the election as not being secure is the disinformation. Get it now?
Especially when the county itself admits it.
I’m sure that if the same thing had happened in, say, Lancaster County PA in 2024, the army of democrat litigators would have said, “No biggie!”
(no message)
(no message)
Answer: You obviously don't. You are just pretending that you do. Again, we find you speaking to the more stupid members of your own party, instead of having reasonable discussion with the opposing side.
From the article: "there is no record of whether the tabulator was set at zero at the start of polling, there is no way of telling whether ballots from a previous election (or ballots from a test run) were left on the memory card and might later be counted."
But Tyrone gives us his personal assurance that everything was fine.
I'm sure Chris94 and jimbasil will accept that, but 97% of the precincts have no records to verify that. That is pretty amazing. Again, only the more stupid members of your party will look at that and say no biggie. And, if it happened the other way around (in favor of Republicans), you and those stupid members of your party would be crying foul and trying to impeach/jail the responsible Republicans.
how the State of Washington verifies the validity of an election outcome...note this part of the paper...dealing with a "Risk Limiting Audit", which Georgia utilized, as per my original link...btw, I'm sure that GA will make sure those signatures are in place next time, so as to save time dealing with desperate challenges from unethical candidates, like Donald Trump.
--------------
The second audit is called a "Risk Limiting Audit." This audit has been designed by statisticians and involves a hand count of ballots chosen at random from a statistical sample. The number of ballots in the sample increases until the audit sufficiently establishes that a full hand count would confirm the original outcome.
--------------
Do some of your own research...along with fully reading what posters provide you...before chirping. They don't call me "Link Boy" for nothing...it works, and saves you much embarrassment....and loss of Credibility ;-) Just ask Baron about his failure to do so regarding the COVID mask issue...he knows he has archived threads waiting for him should he ever come out from his Faux Ignore stance.
(no message)
Consent Management