More on Trump's DOJ failing to release ALL of the Epstein Files...
...DJT's name is in those files...if there's to be justice in this country, they need to be released.
Replies to: More on Trump's DOJ failing to release ALL of the Epstein Files...
Another big drop today - and Trump’s name is on his flight records
OK, he went to rape island - but he didn’t rape anybody. He just went to relax in the fresh air.
The truth is out there!
(no message)
Is Hillary one of those babes in a bathing suit with Slick Willy at poolside?
The face was blacked out so I couldn't tell. Another big drop today. Great, more pictures of Bill in a pool. I think the Democrat left are all getting off with these pictures. Silence for 4 years and now it's priority one. The pee tape, Russian collusion, dictator, king, mentally incapable angle have all flopped big time so they are barely hanging on to the Epstein story. The Minnesota scandal is too big to hide but the Democrats are trying to make it happen.
WSJ reported only FL-NY flights in 90s & no minors. Got a link?
(no message)
Listen to Ms. Lacerda..."Victim #1" in a suit against Epstein...the assaults on her were in NYC...
and Mr. "Grab 'em by the (Genitals)" was on multiple flights in Epstein's plane, along with Ms. Maxwell, to the Big Apple. What business deals do you think prompted those flights for meetings that could easily have been held in Florida? (See her speak in my O'Donnell video)
Remember, this is the guy who just had to have his sexual needs met with Stormy Daniels while his wife was nursing his child...your kind of guy?...someone you think has the qualities your kids should look up to as President of the United States of America?
So, Chris was wrong. Interesting.
(no message)
What are the odds in your mind that DJT, of 'Access Hollywood' and 'Barging In On Miss Teen
Pageant Dressing Rooms' fame, took advantage of girls "On the younger side" at Epstein's place in NYC?...and does that bother you at all?
So you agree no evidence ... you are now just arguing the odds.
I guess we are starting to see why the Biden puppetmasters didn't release this info for 4 years.
Duh...I, and millions of others on both sides of the aisle are insisting on the release of potential
evidence from those 'Epstein Files'...to coin a phrase, based on DJT's prior actions and statements, there's "Probable Cause" to expect incriminating evidence against him in those files..
Do you think the odds of such evidence being found is HIgh or Low?
Lawrence O'Donnell is not a credible source. Just as you, Jim and others won't trust Fox,
We don't trust anything MSNBC says. Case in point: He starts out saying the Supreme Court gave Trump immunity for "anything he does as president." This is completely false and not what the Court ruled.
He’s the worst
(no message)
Just to make sure we've closed on this issue, let me know when you've read my response, and note
whether and why you agree or disagree.
Your reading comprehension let you down..."As President" differs from "As a Private Citizen",
...so, O'Donnell was absolutely correct. Here's an excerpt from the ACLU's summary of this issue...
----------------------
The court granted absolute immunity to President Trump’s use of the Justice Department for fraudulent purposes. With respect to other allegations in the indictment, it sent the case back to the lower courts to determine whether actions for which former President Trump has been charged were official acts or personal acts, and whether the government can rebut the presumption that former President Trump is immune for those official acts. The court did reject former President Trump’s claim to absolute immunity for all acts unless convicted after an impeachment trial, characterizing its ruling as endorsing a “far broader immunity than the limited one” the court “recognized” today.
The American Civil Liberties Union and ACLU of the District of Columbia filed a friend-of-the-court brief arguing that the U.S. Constitution and decades of Supreme Court precedent support the principle that nobody is above the law — even the president. While the court found that a president’s actions as a private individual are not immune to criminal prosecution, it held that presidents do have substantial immunity for their official actions – even when undertaken for personal ends and criminal purposes.
---------------------
And, if you pay attention to news sources that publicly provide their Code of Journalistic Ethics, like MS NOW (formerly MSNBC), rather than those that don't...e.g. FOX who had to pay $787M for Knowingly publishing False Statements,..you won't have to be corrected so often.
Link: https://www.aclu.org/press-releases/supreme-court-grants-trump-broad-immunity-for-official-acts-placing-presidents-above-the-law
ACLU interpretation...and substantial immunity is not complete immunity as O'Donnell said
(no message)
Again..."As President"..."As President"..."As President"...not "As Private Citizen"...Words Matter.
...and As President, the SCOTUS established No Firm Guidelines as to what constituted Immunity and what didn't...consequently, DJT is Free to Decide for himself until someone tries to stop him with a loooong drawn out court challenge...meanwhile...he continues to do as he pleases. Got it?
If you look up the meaning of "smarmy" Lawrence O'Donnell's picture is the illustration.
(no message)
Just thankful it’s not Rosie O’Donnell’s picture…
(no message)
Lawrence O'Donnell brings personal, real world experience as a staff member to Senator Moynihan for
many years. He's not only a journalist, but someone with deep understanding of how D.C. operates, and is well connected to official sources in the Federal Government. Additionally, his network publishes their Journalistic Code of Ethics...and they stand by them...not like FOX, et al, who support a Convicted Felon, and incessant liar.
If he's such a journalist of integrity, why did he lie about the Supreme Court ruling?
(no message)
He didn't...but you're coming close.
(no message)
He talks DOWN to everyone... as if he is the owner of the truth.
The man has not a whit of self-consciousness.
Classic old school liberal. .
Just because you may feel inferior, doesn't justify that comment...he is appreciated by his many
listeners for his knowledgable and fact based comments.
He is appreciated by those who also suffer no self-doubt.
There is nothing more sanctimonious than one who believes he is NEVER wrong.
Sadly, seeing the world as black and white is the ultimate blindness.
It's up to you to cite a case where you believe he, or anyone else at MS NOW, is wrong. As yet,
I haven't seen anything from you that backs up your opinion...don't let me stop you, I'm after the truth, too.
Ironical you having this exchange with the crowned prince of sanctimony …
“Clowned”…would be more accurate…
More support for DJT.
(no message)
Um, SCOTUS did give the presidency (in particular, trump) immunity for all actions while in office.
That’s a FACT.
Other than being FOX TV informed I can’t figure out why you posted that.
As per trump, the lawlessness of his DOJ continues with Bondi. As with Barr
the continued corruption of all things government and legal are distorted and she’s probably far worse.
There is no honesty honor or integrity in the trump administration. And we will see it reflected in the down votes you receive along with the supporting DJT comments in the thread.
Consent Management