His podcast, Impact Theory, is great BTW.
Link: https://youtube.com/shorts/JW_K5IRUeMA?si=Ci5XJieNqL-_ZeDy
(no message)
anywhere near the front of her car....and once again, Ms. Good turned her car wheels away from him...
btw, a young mother of three was killed...people had better react to this event.
You couldn't wait to smear Charlie Kirk with hateful propaganda and lies after he was taken out by one of you people.
problem.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
The first implies intent to kill, and in this case without a proper trial.
The second implies authorized use of deadly force under the law to halt an aggression that threatened serious bodily injury or death.
The first is not an option available to ICE. The second is an option available under the law, as Conor ably showed when he posted the Federal force use policy document.
But, if you keep implying that the first option was taken, you just might be able to get Conor's "slow people" the set fire to Minneapolis, which I know you think would help your party out, but it would certainly damage your "I'm a holy 100% Catholic" image you've been trying to establish in the last few days.
[By the way, do you think the Capitol Police had a right to execute Ashli Babbitt? Just curious. Either way, I would be interested in hearing your theory as to why or why not.]
himself near the front of the car, thus turning a traffic blocking issue into a deadly confrontation...but even then Ms. Good was able to turn her car away from him without causing him any injury...yet he pulled his weapon and killed her.
After an hour or more of frantic calls on the Capitol Police radios of extreme violence and harmful rhetoric against lawmakers, Ms. Babbitt sadly chose to be the first to try and get past the last defensive line protecting nearly 80 lawmakers from the mob. There were hundreds of rioters and only a handful of Capitol Police Officers, therefore deadly force was warranted to stop the onslaught...Odd that you can't see the difference...maybe you should get re-qualified soon for the Bar
Link: http://u
Amicable. Given the inability to have rational discourse, and the fact that the sides are so far apart, I’d support it.
Bad mouth him all the time. You think those people are going to want to move to NY, California or Oregon?
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Consent Management