Three Sioux detained by ICE morons
This is what happens when skin color is considered probable cause.
And when white nationalists are in charge in Washington.
Link: https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/5688969-oglala-sioux-tribe-demands-action/
Replies to: Three Sioux detained by ICE morons
Man, these ICE agents are really off the reservation.
(no message)
Your fake outrage is noted and truthfully, it’s kinda funny.
We look forward to all the ICE happenings that make you fake mad.
Must be the new Dem talking point.
Just like the untrained ICE agent it won’t last long.
Like this?
(no message)
Link: https://x.com/sadie_nc/status/2007299079509049570?s=61
Funny as hell
(no message)
America is now a police state where the color of one's skin is fair game to detain and arrest.
The midterms are 9+ months away.
Trump's poll numbers will continue to plummet.
Yes, I believe that this was the talking point that this event was meant to push.
(no message)
I suppose that we will hear about every (alleged) anecdotal misstep by ICE.
I'll lay it out for you, Chris:
Your lib folk created this problem of a large influx illegal criminals in our country with your unvetted border opening.
Your lib folks efforts to derail ICE's efforts to enforce the law makes it much harder for them to be perfect.
There WILL be broken eggs with this clean up omellette effort....and that is on you and your lib folk.
Regarding this arrest of Native Americans:
....good grief the Left is so obvious with their set ups - and this one smells real fishy.
News flash: Most tribes are hard, hard core left. The timing, in MN again, the reaction time of demands, the media release.
I am applying the Ned Rule here.
Let's see how this looks in 48 to 72 hours. Of course, libs will move on by then.
This is either one of your cracked eggs as explained above, or it is yet another lib set up.
So...it is OK to detain Native Americans in a sweep of brown people because there are protestors.
Gotcha.
I wonder why it ICE generating protests. I mean, if you can't trust a group of undertrained, stressed out guys who can hardly read but who know they will have essentially 100% immunity for any actions they take, then who can you trust?
You’re so intellectually lazy, you don’t read the posts anymore.
(no message)
In fairness, most of your ilk’s posts aren’t worth reading.
(no message)
Not enough pictures.
(no message)
That might help you with your grammar
(no message)
Nice comeback.
(no message)
What’s the story, there Chris? Think there’s more?
(no message)
Were you upset when this was happening?
Im sure there were mistakes made here too but I’m going to wager a guess it didn’t matter to you.
Link: https://x.com/mazemoore/status/2011245839096725808?s=61
Trumptards call ‘em “Injuns.”
(no message)
Using derogatory "tards" while accusing others of using derogatory names. Liberalism Rule #1
Accuse others of that which you yourself do.
You mock the mentally disabled while falsely accusing those who disagree with you of mocking Native Americans.
Despite your unwillingness to admit it, you are a liberal though and through.
I think they prefer Oglala or Lakota.
(no message)
We're they arrested for interfering with law enforcement?
Article doesn't say, but I know previous arrests of US citizens for crimes were portrayed by the Left as if they were illegal alien detentions, when they were actually legitimate arrests of US citizens for criminal activity. That is a useful way to spread fear and fabricate outrage.
This is A-OK to the Trumptard contingent…
I’m sure most of these fools had abbreviated training when they joined ICE. That’s definitely the Trump credo…inserting inexperienced dumb asses into important jobs.
Are all of the killings of US citizens by illegal criminals ok with you? Shall we post them too?
Stop reacting to issues by how you "feel", and try to use logic and reason instead. In other words, try to stop thinking like a liberal, and use your brain like conservatives do.
Stupid question…
Typical. Are you OK with poorly trained ICE agents cavalierly detaining US citizens?
And you misspelled, “like Trumptards do.” You’re welcome for the correction.
Regarding violent criminal illegals…deport ‘em. I’m all for it. That’s not what ICE is doing, for the most part. They’re apprehending every suspected illegal they can. Trump promised to deport the criminal element…that ain’t happening. Hell, Bush, Obama, and Clinton all deported millions more than Trump in their first year. Guess what, no one rioted or protested. Want to know why? It’s because they did it the right way. Trump has made a mockery of the process. He’s a first class dick.
Sure, if they are breaking the law. I also grant leniency for planned media "gotcha" events. Why?
(no message)
Define breaking the law and when is it OK to shoot a helpless woman in the face?
(no message)
Your not helpless when wielding 4000 lb battering ram w 3.5-liter V6 w 285 hp & 262 lb/ft of torque
But you forgot that, didn't you. So convenient.
Where would you like him to shoot her? Does she have any fault in being there, impeding ICE
And hitting the agent with her SUV. And yes, she did hit him. She wasn’t just this innocent bystander. She went looking for ICE to obstruct their operation. She trained to do what she out to do. She was part of a convoy and it bit her in the ass, well, shot her in the face, but you get what I mean.
Barely touched him, yet he had internal bleeding. What a farce…
And the same can be said about Trumptards. Disgraceful sycophants
Ever been injured?
I am reminded of Nicholas Forsberg who played an entire period of an NHL hockey game with a ruptured spleen.
We don't know the extent nor location of the agents injury or bleeding. It could be a reference to bruising, but even in that case, ruptures of vessels in the abd wall can cause very significant blood loss due to dissection of tissue planes by the blood. It could be internal bleeding as well which you refuse to entertain. But you falsely assume because he stood around afterwards for a short while on film that he was not hit significantly.
But the issue isn't really what he suffered, it's that in either case, it represented enough of a threat to justify his defense reaction i n that split second when this crazy protestor lost her head and gunned her engine with him standing right in front of her.
Your definition of Trump applies to those supporters who should know better...maybe more so.
(no message)
So the Sioux shall sue?
(no message)
This could be bad. We wouldn't want the Indians to think we don't honor our treaties with them.
(no message)
Consent Management