Trump’s letter to the leader of Norway
In which he links the Nobel snub to his desire to take Greenland.
We seriously have a crazy person in the White House. This is beyond infantile.
Can you imagine the damage this man is going to do in the next three years?
Link: https://x.com/newswire_us/status/2013129349893873989?s=46&t=kVeQeQf8ed0KokuRgfOE0g
Replies to: Trump’s letter to the leader of Norway
I wonder if Denmark would accept Minnesota in trade for Greenland.
Probably not. Who the hell would want Minnesota???
They trolled Trump for a funny and offered to buy CA. Pretty good.
(no message)
It they are serious, throw in NY as a bonus.
(no message)
Seems your dear leader does based on the excessive federal intervention
(no message)
Pope Leo? I doubt that.
Actually, I wouldn't even call Leo my dear leader. I follow the Magisterium of the Church.
Who is your dear leader? The leader of CPUSA?
I'm going to bookmark this post...esp. wrt to the "Magisterium"...
(no message)
Why? Can say the same? We already know you can't.
Im just saying I am Catholic without reservation. I guess you plan on holding me to a higher standard than you hold yourself to?
Any time you want to join me in full communion with the Church, let me know.
You’re a catholic yet you voted for and support a guy who’ committed countless mortal sins
(no message)
I did not vote for Harris or Biden, so take that back.
Seriously, voting is always selecting the lesser of two evils for me, which is why your dear leader accusation makes no sense. Trump is as much my dear leader just as Kamala would be yours if you voted for her...perhaps more so, since I suspect you like her more than I like Trump.
Besides, if you vote based on mortal sin, you would have to vote for Trump over any candidate who supports abortion. Publicly supporting mortal sin is far worse than personally committing mortal sin.
I’m not a catholic, but if you think Kamala has committed more mortal sins than…
Trump, you’re a fool. And the lesser of two evils? That’s comical. Thanks for the laugh.
I can't judge their personal sins. I just know she publicly supports mortal sin.
Accordingly, she is far worse than Trump by that measure...a measure that you suggested be used for this discussion.
Is one mortal sin worse than multiple mortal sins?
(no message)
Public support for sin is worse than private acts of sin.
Does that make sense?
People privately sin all the time. Even the pope goes to confession. The first pope, Peter, denied Christ three times. We have had many sinful popes. Our leaders sin; we know that. But the real question is, do they sin out of personal weakness, or do they publicly support and encourage sin in others. The latter is worse.
Any candidate who publicly supports hundreds of thousands of homicides per year of innocent people, and indeed wants to use public money to encourage those homicides by paying for them domestically and overseas, is a far worse candidate than any candidate the GOP has run, including Trump...at least if you want to compare those candidates using the measuring stick of mortal sin, as you tried to do.
You’re a Trumptard. Quit trying to deflect as usual. Own your vote
(no message)
I've never not owned my vote. Own YOUR vote. I guess Kamala is your dear leader?
(no message)
Continue to deflect. It makes you look dumber and dumber. Typical Trumptard.
(no message)
Says the guy deflecting from admitting Kamala is his dear leader.
(no message)
Kamala isn’t the president, so again…admit that you’re the typical Trumptard sycophant
(no message)
So, if Kamala won, you would be a typical Kamalatard sycophant.
You have a weird way of looking at things. Perhaps you get a little too invested in politics.
Methinks you and the rest of the Trumptard contingent are politically special needs.
(no message)
Better than being logically special needs, I suppose.
(no message)
Originality ain’t your thing, huh?
(no message)
Don’t ya love when posts disappear for no reason. I can’t have an opinion on the world sponging
Off of the US and calling them freeloaders. Talk about heavy handed moderation.
Unfit indeed.
"What’s at stake is not only Greenland’s sovereignty, but also trust. Alliances rest on predictability and on the expectation that power, especially allied power, remains bound by law. If international law can be set aside when it becomes inconvenient, trust is gone. If strategic calculations lead to a disregard for sovereignty in Greenland, how will Europe continue to believe in U.S. commitments elsewhere?"
Link: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/19/opinion/greenland-trump-europe.html
That’s what happens when they gave Obama the Nobel Prize just for showing up to work
(no message)
That’s what happens? A weird dotard obsession with Greenland?
(no message)
Yep. He would have been peaceful if they had just given him the prize. Shame on them.
(no message)
Nah…totally normal behavior for a President
(no message)
he’s just getting started. I wonder how much of this is Stephen Miller’s doing.
(no message)
No Joke...it's time for the 25th Amendment...and if that won't work...Impeachment...ASAP.
(no message)
Conservative DC Insiders seem to think he is gone after the midterms. If they do it now, they lose
big during the midterms. Plus, if Vance takes over now, he can only serve one additional term. Better to wait a year.
Think of the country first...waiting another year is far too dangerous. btw, I've thought about JDV
in the context of DJT being removed for several months...I agree that he would benefit from a post Midterm transition by being able to serve two more terms, but his chances of winning any election after his over-the-top association with Trump, and his basic lack of appeal to the general public as demonstrated in several polls, should lead the GOP to make a Hard Turn Away from the MAGA path...hopefully returning to rational Conservatism. Again, we need TWO stable and rational parties...Liberal and Conservative...committed to the Constitution and Rule of Law. What we have now is an aberration...it can be repaired, so let's get started.
Not sure how any sane American MAGA, Dem or Ind can think this is ok behavior.
(no message)
The Greenland issue is pure craziness
(no message)
The way he is handling it is totally counterproductive.
(no message)
Can you please be a little more consistent?…
Above you stated that this dumb ass move is counterproductive and here you stare that the message has some value. WTF
This is a start. Good on ya’
(no message)
It actually makes some sense from a defense standpoint. This clip is fictional, but also factual
(no message)
Link: https://youtu.be/__0Qubv3Dn8?si=bSzathNBwM_YUsof
Right. WSJ had several articles on this from before Trump started calling attention to the issue
Great show, by the way.
No it doesn’t. We could deploy as many troops as we want to Greenland RIGHT NOW
(no message)
Denmark effectively being like Canada...prospering under our protection.
...being defenseless itself and not having to worry about it.
Then let’s deploy them, throwing an American flag on it and say “dibs”.
(no message)
Love the show...can't wait for the next season. Note that even Allison Janey isn't suggesting that
the U.S. annex Scotland. Getting back to our situation, Denmark...and the Greenlanders have a Long History of hosting U.S. Military bases on that island (17 at last count) and have clearly expressed their willingness to continue such cooperation. You know the right answer to all of this...Remove Trump...ASAP.
The United States has been trying to purchase Greenland for a long long time.
(no message)
Big difference between “purchase” and military force, huh? Can’t recall a past sitting…
President threatening military intervention against an ally.
Threatening to take Greenland by force is asinine.
Although, we would do it in 2 seconds if war broke out with Russia, just like the UK invaded Iceland at the beginning of WWII.
Trump just seems to think it is unfair for us to be the sole de facto protector of Greenland in war time with no upside in peacetime. And, he certainly has a point. But, boy is he navigating this like a bull in a china closet.
Every option is on the table. Buy, rent, or take. Message to Russia & China.
The safety and protection of our country is at stake so if any of this bothers NATO and anti-Trumpers, let them cry on each others shoulders. Russia and China are both digging the resistance from squishy Americans and NATO.
Do you have any idea of our global deployment capabilities?…
Threatening to annex an allied territory wouldn’t solve shit. Wake the fuck up and quit being so damn stupid. Senility is definitely setting in, huh?
As a message to Russia and China, his statements do have some value.
(no message)
What value? Trump has already shown he is spineless when it comes to Russia and China
(no message)
When has he operated any other way? It’s how he does things and hasn’t changed. Bluster at the
Beginning. And because it’s out of the norm, it drives everyone crazy. I’m sorry, but the norm may need to change. Business as usually has only gotten politicians richer. I love rocking the boat. Sometimes, it needs to be done.
True. And it often/usually woks.
That is why I usually remain quiet when he says something that seems crazy. He is usually setting the table for the next round.
Exactly. But people think it’s their job to monitor what he says on social media and post it here.
I have no issue with him being politically incorrect. I prefer things that way. I love he rubs people the wrong and does things differently. Status quo got us to this position with debt and being a welfare program to the world.
Consent Management