Minneapolis police chief on Deface the Nation invoking the 2nd Amendment when asked if it was legal
for the dead man to bring two magazines to a protest. These people are such dishonest sacks of sheet.
Replies to: Minneapolis police chief on Deface the Nation invoking the 2nd Amendment when asked if it was legal
Not illegal, just incredibly stupid. Did he urge residents to exercise restraint and common sense?
(no message)
The escalation was 100% on ICE (unless you are watching an Earth II video).
(no message)
Law enforcement is provocation, eh counselor?
(no message)
Reckless unhinged law enforcement = escalation
(no message)
You're the one supporting reckless, unhinged behavior..
(no message)
Only you MAGAmorons are supporting reckless unhinged behavior.
(no message)
Yes, biting someone’s finger off is perfectly normal behavior.
(no message)
Attempting to fight 7+ armed officers is the definition of reckless and unhinged.
(no message)
Agsin, there must be a video copy in braille just for you.
(no message)
They have the video in braille just for you.
(no message)
Why do you need 30 "bullets" for self-defense?!?! Is the question they'd be asking.
In fact, I believe that question was asked here about Rittenhouse.
That part I understand. Hard to hit multiple attackers with single bullet each.
(no message)
Why bring a gun with 42 rounds to a peaceful protest?!?!
I don't know anyone who concealed carries that brings an extra mag, especially with a 21+1 capacity.
A prosecutor would point out that he was carrying a high end, custom firearm that is favored by professionals, military and police with a reflex sight. They would argue that the extra mag goes to intent.
This is all very strange.
That part agree with you.
(no message)
He was disarmed. Then shot. No investigation will ensue.
(no message)
This has to be investigated. He wasn’t in possession of gun when shot.
(no message)
Agreed. But DHS has already passed judgment.
(no message)
Then that is an avoidable major mistake.
(no message)
You don’t know that. Each situation is unique.
(no message)
Yes. The Second Amendment is only designed to protect the Kyle Rittenhouse’s in America.
(no message)
In every other context, you folks want the gun prohibited, and of course someone carrying two mags.
But that stance is inconvenient here, so you suddenly sound like NRA zealots and, with straight faces, explain how the precious 2nd Amendment must be followed.
Dishonest sacks of sheet.
I’m not the hypocrite.
Strongly favor strict gun control.
Assault weapons and weapons of war. Far different than what he was carrying. You all keep inventing
a false narrative to suit your bullshit agenda.
In every other context, you people oppose any civilian carrying around two mags.
Stop lying. You people have no hesitation lying day after day. None.
Again, you build a false narrative to support your bullshit agenda.
(no message)
Internet fluffers in their safe space criticizing agents who work in extreme conditions.
None of us were in that pile. None of us were there in the moment. The fun fact is none of you would last one week working as an ICE agent in Minneapolis. Is it asking too much to let the investigation play out before the TDS crowd start blaming DJT and MAGA? Probably is.
Consent Management