House D-IL Ramirez: "Greatest threat to the Homeland is the Dept. of Homeland Security."
Above all other threats to the U.S. is DHS.
So, the question is this: Is violence justified against the greatest single threat to our nation?
Or, are we so safe that even the greatest threat against us does not warrant violence to stop that threat?
Replies to: House D-IL Ramirez: "Greatest threat to the Homeland is the Dept. of Homeland Security."
This is the same Illinois Dem who supports gambling, weed, & abortion as state revenue.
(no message)
Homeland Security is far afield from their mission, when enacted in November 2002.
While signed into law on Nov. 25, 2002, DHS was established as a direct response to the September 11th terrorist attacks to reorganize, unify, and strengthen national security efforts.
Core Missions:
Prevent Terrorism: Prevent terrorist attacks within the U.S. and reduce vulnerability to threats.
Secure Borders: Manage and secure the nation's borders, territorial waters, and air space.
Emergency Response: Lead in disaster preparation, management, and recovery (e.g., FEMA).
Cybersecurity/Infrastructure: Protect critical infrastructure and cyber networks.
Seems like Billie Eilish is writing her material…or maybe Phineas…
(no message)
Do you still beat your wife, Ned? [A straw question is just a straw question.]
(no message)
The propensity of the left to turn everything into an existential crisis is tiresome
(no message)
Yes, the catastrophising started during CoVid and hasn't abated.
(no message)
Great way to put it. These people literally have no sense of a true threat. Pure emotions.
(no message)
Excellent wordage.
(no message)
Pretty sure I stole the term from MAS.
(no message)
Democrat from Illinois. Do not take seriously.
(no message)
Sounds logical.
(no message)
Rep. Ramirez isn't the only only one deeply concerned about DHS/CBP/ICE leadership...so are GOP
leaders like Sen. Tillis...and none of them are advocating any violence...not sure why you say such things...are YOU trying to foment violence? ;-)
you sound like a revolutionary. do you consider yourself a revolutionary?
(no message)
Trying for another locked thread? ;-)...take a hike '67...(what a piece of work)
(no message)
can't answer, can you? simple question. fyi: taking hikes is good for you.
(no message)
You support violence against the unborn, but not against nazis? Interesting.
(no message)
I support Mercy for women who have had their reproductive systems assaulted against their will, and
allowing them the option of ending such illegitimate pregnancies, if they so choose...like the vast majority of Americans...and the tens of thousands of medical professionals in the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists...i.e. I'm not alone in that judgement.
Now, back to your OP attempt at a strawman argument...I've already responded with the addition of GOP leaders voicing their desire to remove...without violence...Kristi Noem and others in DHS. Based on polling of Republicans, Democrats and Independents across the country, that sentiment is held by a majority.
Did they start with a land acknowledgement?
Something like, we are living on stolen lands so the idea of having borders, a civil civil society and a nation are non-starters. We should welcome in anyone who desires to steal this stolen land from us, because we feel guilty.
Excited by the cage match between Kristi "ICE Barbie" Noem & Stephen "Goebbels" Miller? /s
(no message)
Do you think your audience may think that violence is warranted against nazis?
Or, do you think no one on the Left would ever believe that violence is justified against nazis?
ICE Barbie: Everything I’ve done, I’ve done at the direction of the President and Stephen.
(no message)
Either...
you are incapable of answering a simple question, or
you recognize your own hypocrisy, and you seek to avoid calling attention to it by deflecting with non-sensical comments.
So, we have to guess. I'm going with the second option: You know you are being hypocritical.
An insurrectionist by any definition.
(no message)
Isn't the actual issue that ICE agents killed U.S. citizens?
(no message)
US citizens breaking the law, threatening their lives while resisting and attacking them.
In the case of the violent dude, he brought a gun and reached to use it.
But this rabbit hole isn’t where Ned was going , so I will end it here fully expecting you to rationalize these people’s sad and foolish actions.
The actual issue is what I asked in the opening post.
(no message)
Nah, your straw question is bullshit. The issue is that ICE has assaulted and killed U.S. citizens.
(no message)
And you raged when Ashley Babbitt was murdered by Capitol PD?
(no message)
Maybe you won't answer because you don't understand which answer is worse.
You have adopted a premise which leads only to unacceptable conclusions, and you don't know how to recover, and you are embarrassed, so you flee from your own position.
Consent Management