DHS Secretary talking like someone trying to rig elections
She is a fucking train wreck.
Unless you think it’s ok for someone in her position to be talking about “the right people voting” so we can get “the right leaders.”
You MAGA subhumans would have shit yourselves if Obama’s DHS sec said that.
Link: https://x.com/atrupar/status/2022684997648351423?s=46&t=kVeQeQf8ed0KokuRgfOE0g
Replies to: DHS Secretary talking like someone trying to rig elections
What's the issue with it?
Without inserting mind-reading "what she really meant" substitutions, what's wrong with what she said?
Because the "wrong people voting" are unlikely to vote Republican.
So the high school blowjob queen is saying (without any evidence) that past elections that went Democrat (e.g. 2020) are untrustworthy, and hence, DHS needs to suppress Democrat turnout, and rig the count.
And you'll slurp it up.
That's the mind-reading substitution. Try again.
This time without it. If you can.
Mind reading! You don’t mean that.
Because you know what she meant.
I absolutely do not. Neither do you.
But I read someone saying this and the context is citizens and legally registered voters. Even if she wanted fewer democrats to vote, I don't imagine her stupid enough to say it out loud.
In fairness, he is assuming Trump would do what he would...and libs believe can read minds also.
(no message)
Always the alternative facts two-step from the MAGAelite on this board.
Her message is very clear - frighteningly clear no longer daring. It’s the slow to boil you don’t notice.
Jim just called me “elite”.
(no message)
Apparently he finds you…illuminating.
(no message)
I think she said what she means
She wants the right people voting. Not the wrong people. She’s going to try to stop the wrong people.
The wrong people are those who will vote for the other side.
It’s what dictators say and do. All of them.
Second stanza is what I mean.
Why, given the context, is the interpretation not that the wrong voters are those doing so illegally?
The wrong people are the noncitizens. Your paranoia notwithstanding.
(no message)
Again with the bullshit. It never ends with you people. The only thing missing in your posts
are tiki torches.
Now cite credible evidence that reflects non-citizens voting.
Tell us which states (where elections are monitored by representatives from both parties) are asleep at the wheel whereby DHS needs to take over the process.
1)Multiple instances already cited2)They count toward determining electoral votes,3)You plan amnesty
You can simply search this site to find multiple instances in multiple states……all of which worked in favor of Democrats (funny how that always happens).
Republicans want to place simple, common sense guardrails so that cheating will be more difficult in this modern day of outside manipulation (you yourself have claimed such a concern in the past). Your silly argument is that “show me an instance of cheating” as if it shouldn’t be addressed until it actually happens and wreaks havoc. You also dismiss each instance presented because it doesn’t meet your definition of credibility (namely that it didn’t happen).
Those wanting to cheat oppose guard rails to cheating….esp when those guardrails are simply reinstating the pre existing rules of many years.
Now, since it is you that is making an accusation without any evidence other than your mind reading abilities, how about YOU provide some proof that Bondi means something nefarious from her comments. The burden of proof is on you, the accuser, counselor.
Consent Management