I’m just guessing but I suspect there won’t be a new JCPOA
I suppose this means that ME terrorist will
Have to look elsewhere for pallets of cash,
Replies to: I’m just guessing but I suspect there won’t be a new JCPOA
Peace prize indeed....
(no message)
Remind us… did Chamberlain win a peace prize
Imagine the millions who would have died in this death cult had ever got their hands on nukes.
AND… look at the geopolitical chess board… China is in check.
Donny plays realpolitik
I’m so sick of that stupid analogy
It’s the one thing that morons know about history.
Iran is not Nazi germany. For chrissakes.
Iran wants to kill all Jews but is not Nazi Germany!
You’re right there are distinctions… but they are irrelevant!
Germany was the most powerful country in the world. Iran is a pathetic mess.
The Munich analogy is for idiots.
I bet conor thinks Nazi women are hot.
(no message)
The Iranians offered a deal. Trump and Netanyahu prefer war.
We get to do this every six months in perpetuity, I guess.
No way this goes sideways.
BTW, what was the deal? Trump gave Iran a deal, too, but apparently Iran preferred war.
(no message)
War or release 4 FBI interviews w/13-15 year old who Trump violently sexually assaulted?
(no message)
Hey there Fluffy McButter. Supply the evidence. Evidence that the Dems never released before.
(no message)
Iranians dancing in streets of Los Angeles today. Interesting that you are disappointed by this.
(no message)
NYC Dems protesting. So interesting to see Dems oppose entire world & choose autocrats over people.
(no message)
Yeah, war is always preferred.
(no message)
How you know? Have you ever served anything other than a table? Go away
(no message)
Why do you oppose the liberation of Iranian people? Hitler & Göring just killed, and you are upset.
War is not always preferred. That's an asinine comment. But, if this works (big if at this point, still, although things are going very well), this will be a just "war."
because I’m not for war doesn’t mean I’m not for the liberation of the Iranian people.
You set everything in a strawman fallacy.
because Iranians welcome this, you are probably wrong to oppose it.
(no message)
Nice post. Well stated.
(no message)
Come on Ned, only one reason and it starts with TDS, that's it. Bunch of losers
(no message)
We can deliver our riches to Iran in the form of cash, or missiles.
At least with the second option, the Iranian people have a chance to overthrow their autocratic government (which would stop the missiles), as opposed to having their autocratic government being funded by Democrats (which cash payments will never end...we are talking about extortionists, after all).
Hopefully Iran is depleting that Obama cash in the missiles they are sending against us.
(no message)
Consent Management