I’m just guessing but I suspect there won’t be a new JCPOA
I suppose this means that ME terrorist will
Have to look elsewhere for pallets of cash,
Replies to: I’m just guessing but I suspect there won’t be a new JCPOA
Peace prize indeed....
(no message)
Remind us… did Chamberlain win a peace prize
Imagine the millions who would have died in this death cult had ever got their hands on nukes.
AND… look at the geopolitical chess board… China is in check.
Donny plays realpolitik
I’m so sick of that stupid analogy
It’s the one thing that morons know about history.
Iran is not Nazi germany. For chrissakes.
Iran wants to kill all Jews but is not Nazi Germany!
You’re right there are distinctions… but they are irrelevant!
Germany was the most powerful country in the world. Iran is a pathetic mess.
The Munich analogy is for idiots.
You bring up Hitler a lot. Why is he ok, but Chamberlain is not?
You seem to be intentionally obtuse on this.
You can have peace at any time. Just "accept a proposed deal" in which you give everything away. It is clear that Chamberlain thought that way. You also think that way. An analogy is thereby formed.
But you don't speak for everyone. Many think that there are some things worth fighting for. Your attitude reminded me of a great speech. You can say "the Cold War" is not "the current war with Iran," and try to claim that there is no such thing as an analogy. But, analogies do exist, in spite of your personal disbelief in their existence.
Do you support Trump's constant efforts to have Zelensky stop fighting and give in to Putin? Recall
the infamous ambush DJT and JDV conducted on Zelensky at the White House. You are nothing if not Disingenuous.
I bet conor thinks Nazi women are hot.
(no message)
The Iranians offered a deal. Trump and Netanyahu prefer war.
We get to do this every six months in perpetuity, I guess.
No way this goes sideways.
BTW, what was the deal? Trump gave Iran a deal, too, but apparently Iran preferred war.
(no message)
War, or release 4 FBI interviews w/13-15 year old who Trump violently sexually assaulted?
(no message)
Hey there Fluffy McButter. Supply the evidence. Evidence that the Dems never released before.
(no message)
Iranians dancing in streets of Los Angeles today. Interesting that you are disappointed by this.
(no message)
NYC Dems protesting. So interesting to see Dems oppose entire world & choose autocrats over people.
(no message)
Yeah, war is always preferred.
(no message)
How you know? Have you ever served anything other than a table? Go away
(no message)
Why do you oppose the liberation of Iranian people? Hitler & Göring just killed, and you are upset.
War is not always preferred. That's an asinine comment. But, if this works (big if at this point, still, although things are going very well), this will be a just "war."
because I’m not for war doesn’t mean I’m not for the liberation of the Iranian people.
You set everything in a strawman fallacy.
Actually, Jim is consistent, the problem is someone but not him, has to wield the stick.
(no message)
because Iranians welcome this, you are probably wrong to oppose them on it.
(no message)
Avoiding war is never wrong.Try not to forget, I’m one of two on here who believed, Biden
should have given, Zelensky long range armament immediately upon Putin’s invasion.
Easy sweetie, You might get hurt bending over to kiss yr own ass
(no message)
Nice post. Well stated.
(no message)
Come on Ned, only one reason and it starts with TDS, that's it. Bunch of losers
(no message)
We can deliver our riches to Iran in the form of cash, or missiles.
At least with the second option, the Iranian people have a chance to overthrow their autocratic government (which would stop the missiles), as opposed to having their autocratic government being funded by Democrats (which cash payments will never end...we are talking about extortionists, after all).
Hopefully Iran is depleting that Obama cash in the missiles they are sending against us.
(no message)
The Pallet of Cash was unfrozen Iranian money...sorry to spoil your trope...Oh, and it bought us
verification that Iran wasn't enriching uranium beyond 5%...way better than being on pins and needles about how many months/weeks until they set off a thermonuclear weapon...even if you don't agree that's important.
You bring that up constantly as if it matters. Weird.
(no message)
What’s weird is you not comprehending the value of IAEA inspectors verifying Iran’s
Compliance with the enrichment terms of the JCPOA….or the catastrophic risk of that theocracy producing nuclear weapons.
Consent Management