And others are pissed off, and will consider the Ayatollah to be a martyr.
And they will try to avenge him.
No sign yet that the regime is in any troubleā¦that can change, but as of now, the new boss is the same as the old boss.
Right now, we have two sides of the issue, as you point out:
1) Those who support the ayatollah's regime, including Democrats; and
2) Those who oppose the ayatollah's regime, including the rest of the world with the GOP and Fetterman.
The best method for determining who is in the right seems to be to look for the side Democrats are protesting for, and then select the opposite side.
That's not the point of those who are critical of Trump's decision yesterday.
Going to war and launching military power comes with risk and costs.
Congress is entitled to know:
What's the mission?
What's the objective?
What's the basis in international law?
What is the action plan for regime change?
Intelligence estimate for success?
What are the risks?
What are the US casualty estimates?
Duration?
Costs?
How much of our military hardware will be depleted?
Impact on economy?
Support from our allies?
All of the above are reasonable questions .... and consistent with a democracy weighing in thru elected members of Congress.
Notice that Putin on his own, decided to invade Ukraine 4 years ago.
We are not Russia.
Please provide a link to Obama's answers to these questions when he supported toppling Muammar Gaddafi.
(no message)
his administration.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Not your problem, right Cheeks?
--------------------
"I want real help for the Iranians, not bombs," protest organizer Etan Maburakh said.
The issue is personal for Maburakh. His family was forced to flee Iran to the United States, and he says while he understands the need for regime change, war is not the answer.
"When they bomb elementary schools killing 85 schoolgirls, that doesn't bring freedom and democracy," he said.
------------------
Consent Management