Geez that Fetterman looks like the Grandpa from the Addams Family but at least he is fairminded on
the Iran matter.
Replies to: Geez that Fetterman looks like the Grandpa from the Addams Family but at least he is fairminded on
His transformation since his treatment at Walter Reed is remarkable
They are truly miracle workers there.
More Dems should seek treatment.
He is for a closed border & deportations. He also supports what we are doing in Iran.
John is a Democrat but he is also a patriot who has the support of his voters. The Dem left are all upset because he is not threatened by their hissy fits.
My girl and I were talking about it this morning. Politics aside, his recovery has been remarkable.
I haven't seen him walk, so I don't know if he is dealing with any physical paralysis but his brain sure does seem to be hittn on all 8
He’s mentally ill. Republicans took the cowards path, avoiding a vote on the war.
It is a war.
Not approved by Congress.
Hence, it is an unlawful use of military power.
Fetterman will get primaried. The cult demands 100% loyalty.
Isn't it a bit premature (by something like 85 days), before you can pronounce these strikes in violation of the War Powers Resolution?
I'm curious if you think:
1) Kosovo was an illegal war (which went beyond the initial 60 day limit?
2) Libya was an illegal war since it went well beyond the total of 90 days without Congressional approval?
3) Obama sending troops to Syria in direct contravention of the explicit Congressional prohibitions against doing so?
If you think Clinton's and Obama's actions are permitted, does that weaken your position against Trump regarding Iran?
Conor is afraid that the Iran intervention could be successful.
Conor has no concern for the Iranian people, he's concerned about the political ramifications at home if Trump was able to liberate the Iranians without troops on the ground.
Conor is not with the Iranians celebrating the death of the Ayatollah, Conor is with the lunatics protesting the death of the guy who just slaughtered 30K Iranians.
It's like Queers for Hamas or Feminists for Sharia Law, don't try to make sense of it.
The “intervention” better be successful.
It remains unlawful. We understand that the rule of law is meaningless to folks like you.
In one way, it's already successful.
The message is, if you kill 30K of your citizens, simply for protesting, we will kill you.
Whether that leads to liberation, we'll have to wait and see. But no one should shed a tear for the Ayatollah or that asshole Ahmadenijad.
Every president since 1973 when the War Powers Act was passed has called it unconstitutional. Every single one, Republican and Democrat. The Supreme Court has not ruled on it, and until they do, the Commander in Chief has broad constitutional authority for military action.
It’s unlawful and without precedent.
Cite an example where a US President without congressional approval, and without our nation having been attacked, deployed 40% of US Naval assets, launched a major air campaign against a foreign sovereign and killed its head of state.
There are no such examples.
You may like the result, but this attack is unlawful.
Don’t pretend otherwise.
As Hillary said: " We came, we saw, and he's dead, hahahahaha".
(no message)
What % of naval assets is permissible? Or is that a nonsense point?
(no message)
Straw Man after Straw Man...first it's debating the 50% increase for Defense, now it's 40% of Naval
assets...but never the crux of the argument...i.e. irresponsible spending or Illegal usage of resources. You are Insufferable...but very good at what you do..'-)
Directly questioning a point raised by you is a "Straw Man." Whatever.
I was going to whittle away, point by point, on conor's ridiculous post, but I don't feel like sparring with you, the king of the strawman, who brings up a new issue every post, hoping that the sheer weight of 5 terrible arguments will be perceived as a single strong position.
Uncle Fester?
(no message)
Yeah that's the guy.
(no message)
Festerman?
(no message)
Consent Management