Experts in some fields predict worse in those fields than random predictions...
Most of the topics discussed in the Open fall into the type of field in which claimed expertise is of very little value...in some cases, of negative value.
Replies to: Experts in some fields predict worse in those fields than random predictions...
"Expertise: Defined, Described, Explained"...
...in the end, Expertise is dependent on "Performance"...as judged by peers.
For example...just calling oneself a "Stable Genius" is insufficient...
Link: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3941081/
I've often said many "experts" lack the logical ability to know how to use their knowledge
Just because you have the ability to learn something doesn't necessarily translate into knowing how to use your knowledge. That's a different skill altogether.
Chris rips on me because he thinks people who are academically credentialed in the field (except for Dr. Risch) are the only ones qualified to weigh in on matters in that field. Yet, there are countless examples of ordinary people knowing better about aspects of that subject than do the "experts."
Chris is the perfect example of an expert in his own mind only
(no message)
While I am watching your video, you may watch mine.
The central question being "Are you ideologically possessed." At least one potential answer to why "experts" get things wrong.
Link: https://youtu.be/PHbRueOKzEA?si=WrSKy5CdCgOmgDfZ
Consent Management