Targeting civilian power plants would be a war crime
Trump tonight threatened tonight to destroy Tehran’s power supply if the strait is not opened in 48 hours.
That would be a war crime. No better than Putin.
Replies to: Targeting civilian power plants would be a war crime
Was FDR a war criminal?
If you are consistent and condemn both, I will accept your consistent logic.
If you claim claim no comparison, explain.
If you avoid answering (e.g., by falling back on whataboutism), we will know you are just being partisan.
Given that FDR didn't start WWII against Germany and Japan, and that the U.S. took efforts to
conduct risky daylight bombing of critical military and war supporting infrastructure targets...according to the attached discussion of this matter, he'd likely get a "Not Guilty" decision...as for VP and DJT, however, they both started the war with Ukraine and Iran and have the capability to focus only on military related targets, but are failing to do so...and since Trump has launched thousands of attacks on Iran's IRG locations, there should be no need to go after the country's power infrastructure.
As the linked article mentions, it's a question of Proportionality...and Intent. FDR has evidence to justify innocence...DJT...none.
Link: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-63754808
Your premise is wrong, so you'll need a better link as to why daylight bombing. Think Dresden.
Mr. Schmitt has apparently spent his entire career in academia involved in international law, international humanitarian law, use of force issues, and the international law applicable to cyberspace. Quite the warrior. Someone of his ilk passed targeting information including routes and times to the Swiss and you can take a wild ass guess where it went from there, not to mention target restrictions.
Link: https://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/Visit/Museum-Exhibits/Fact-Sheets/Display/Article/196183/daylight-bombing/
Imagining a Nuremberg redux is now your comfort place?! This is just sad.
(no message)
Try the International Criminal Court at The Hague.
(no message)
...and you see George Clooney's wife as the lead prosecutor. Again, this is just pathetic.
I guess that we just have to forget everything that Iran has done, everything that they said that they would do, all of the evidence - including their launching of ICBM's with capabilities that they denied even as recently as a couple of weeks ago. Heh.
What was the mission? The objective? The justification? The legal authority?
Type whatever you nonsense you wish to parrot from cheerleading practice, but the answer to all of the above queries is "none."
Consent Management