a great summary of the scotus dingbat
(no message)
Link: https://x.com/houseofyogi/status/2039525811091390700?s=46
Replies to: “a great summary of the scotus dingbat”
The LAST thing Dems wanted w their SCOTUS pick was competence. They want to change the Constitution.
(no message)
When both Sotomayor and Kagan call her batshit crazy it's true.
She is possibly the worst Justice ever, they are not there to be protesting.
Let us know when you have actually read any opinion authored by any Justice.
(no message)
Link: https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/07/the-most-intense-dissents-of-the-term/
Deflection. Ad hominem. Unsurprising.
(no message)
Like Justice Ginsburg, Justice Jackson’s dissenting opinions are powerful and deftly written.
Starts at page 98. One of three dissenting opinions in CASA.
Link: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24a884_8n59.pdf
By the way, did you read the X link of her incompetence?
"Three separate 8-1 rulings across three years. Lone dissenter every time.
Before the Supreme Court she spent eight years on the DC District Court. More of her rulings were overturned than nearly two-thirds of her peers.
Reversed unanimously for exceeding her jurisdiction.
Tried to overrule Congress on immigration. The court above her said she had no authority.
And that court leaned left. Six of ten judges appointed by Democrats. Even they thought she went too far."
Even a broken clock is right twice a day
If you really think she's a great justice then I question your overall legal acumen.
“ChatKBJ”?
(no message)
A.S. Artificial Stupidity.
(no message)
Party before country. Just absolutely brainwashed.
(no message)
She’s an embarrassment to the profession. At least appear to be something resembling neutral.
(no message)
(no message)
Consent Management