Who’s willing to admit at the end of the day the US will get no better than the JCPOA?
(no message)
Replies to: “Who’s willing to admit at the end of the day the US will get no better than the JCPOA?”
Not under the JCPOA
They were allowed to enrich to 3.67% and no further. LEU, not HEU. You can use the former for power production and other research-related stuff.
Then Trump canceled the JCPOA for no reason. Then, enrichment.
Oops - meant for the cheeks post below
(no message)
Iran has admitted to enriching uranium and the only reason to do that is for a weapon
So no, the pallet of cash strategy was a complete failure.
They were allowed to but under limited levels, not weapon levels. Otherwise I call BS...
if you think they are going to agree to a deal w/o any type of assets unfrozen you're bat shit cra cra!
We will see what happens and for Chris below, yes the Dems might try to spin it.
(no message)
Are you willing to admit that we are already better off than just the JCPOA?
JCPOA + destruction of their nuclear facilities + destruction of much of their conventional power + destruction of their power projecting proxies such as Hamas & Hezbollah >> just JCPOA, right?
We can all look forward to the spin on that.
__
Actually, neither of us should admit anything yet. Why don't we just wait and see before trying to turn this into a domestic political gain for an election?
You are absolutely correct.
I suspect the Iran fan boys are going to be greatly disappointed.
Uh, yea, except they now know they can bring the world to its knees.
There is a reason that Trump is about to back down.
Paging Dr. Spin...that's all you do. All this to get a JCPOA like agreement. While Americans pay
though the nose in gas, risking US lives in combat, etc. Go ahead and be proud of that "accomplishment".
I’m looking forward to the spin
Leaks regarding the 1-page MOU make it sound pretty darn familiar - including billions in sanctions relief and unfrozen funds.
The great negotiator will hammer out an artful deal, a deal never seen before.
(no message)
We can probably assume he at least won't fund their terrorism.
(no message)
Ha! The reports I have seen suggest bllions of unfrozen assets.
(no message)
Consent Management