ADVERTISEMENT
Menu
UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting
  • Football
    • 2026 Notre Dame Schedule
    • 2025 Notre Dame Roster
    • 2025 Notre Dame Coaching Staff
    • Injury News & Updates
    • Notre Dame Football Depth Charts
    • Notre Dame Point Spreads & Betting Odds
    • Notre Dame Transfer Portal
    • NFL Fighting Irish
    • Game Archive
    • Player Archive
    • Past Seasons & Results
  • Recruiting
    • Commits
    • News & Rumors
    • Class of 2018 Commit List
    • Class of 2019 Commit List
    • Class of 2020 Commit List
    • Class of 2021 Commit List
    • Archives
  • History
    • Notre Dame Bowl History
    • Notre Dame Football's NFL Draft History
    • Notre Dame Football ESPN GameDay History
    • Notre Dame Heisman Trophy Winners
    • Notre Dame Football National Championships
    • Notre Dame Football Rivalries
    • Classic Notre Dame Football Games
    • Touchdown Jesus
    • Notre Dame Traditions
    • The Fighting Irish
  • Basketball
  • Forums
    • Chat Room
    • Football Forum
    • Open Forum
    • Basketball Board
    • Ticket Exchange
  • Videos
    • Notre Dame Basketball Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Recruiting Highlights
    • Notre Dame Player Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Hype Videos
  • Latest News
  • Gear
  • About
    • Advertise With Us
    • Contact Us
    • Our RSS Feeds
    • Community Rules
    • Privacy Policy
Home > Forums > The Open Forum
Login | Register
Upvote this post.
-6
Downvote this post.

Who’s willing to admit at the end of the day the US will get no better than the JCPOA?

Author: Quest4twelve  (7509 Posts - Joined: Aug 5, 2015)
Posted at 11:50 am on May 7, 2026
View Single

(no message)

Replies to: “Who’s willing to admit at the end of the day the US will get no better than the JCPOA?”


Thread Level: 2

Not under the JCPOA

Author: Chris94  (38715 Posts - Original UHND Member)
Posted at 4:03 pm on May 7, 2026
View Single

They were allowed to enrich to 3.67% and no further. LEU, not HEU. You can use the former for power production and other research-related stuff.

Then Trump canceled the JCPOA for no reason. Then, enrichment.


Thread Level: 3

You put a lot of faith in the words of terrorist dictators.

Author: iairishcheeks  (29599 Posts - Original UHND Member)
Posted at 6:13 pm on May 7, 2026
View Single

(no message)

Thread Level: 4

No I don't. Nothing in the JCPOA was based on trust.

Author: Chris94  (38715 Posts - Original UHND Member)
Posted at 6:19 pm on May 7, 2026
View Single

The verification measures were extensive.

Thread Level: 3

Verified by IAEA Nuclear Fuel Experts...on the ground in Iran...with the ability to conduct

Author: TyroneIrish  (24400 Posts - Joined: Oct 8, 2020)
Posted at 5:57 pm on May 7, 2026
View Single

environmental tests for indications of possible enrichment activity anywhere in the country. Iran was complying with the agreement...until Trump pulled the U.S. out...that's when the enrichment increased to 60%.

Thread Level: 3

Oops - meant for the cheeks post below

Author: Chris94  (38715 Posts - Original UHND Member)
Posted at 4:21 pm on May 7, 2026
View Single

(no message)

Thread Level: 2

Iran has admitted to enriching uranium and the only reason to do that is for a weapon

Author: iairishcheeks  (29599 Posts - Original UHND Member)
Posted at 3:35 pm on May 7, 2026
View Single

So no, the pallet of cash strategy was a complete failure.

Thread Level: 3

So djt wisely broke our agreement, the JCPOA and Iran started working on weapons grade uranium.

Author: jimbasil  (54497 Posts - Joined: Nov 15, 2007)
Posted at 6:34 pm on May 7, 2026
View Single

Yeah, it must have been their money returned to them that made them do it.

Jack, he is a banker
and Jane, she is a clerk
Thread Level: 3

They were allowed to but under limited levels, not weapon levels. Otherwise I call BS...

Author: Quest4twelve  (7509 Posts - Joined: Aug 5, 2015)
Posted at 4:00 pm on May 7, 2026
View Single

if you think they are going to agree to a deal w/o any type of assets unfrozen you're bat shit cra cra!

Thread Level: 4

If they like their bridges and power plants, they will agree to whatever we want.

Author: iairishcheeks  (29599 Posts - Original UHND Member)
Posted at 6:11 pm on May 7, 2026
View Single

And then resume enriching uranium on pursuit of a bomb.

Only way out of this permanently is regime change.


Thread Level: 2

We will see what happens and for Chris below, yes the Dems might try to spin it.

Author: THEISMANCARR  (18001 Posts - Joined: Aug 10, 2007)
Posted at 3:01 pm on May 7, 2026
View Single

(no message)

Thread Level: 2

Are you willing to admit that we are already better off than just the JCPOA?

Author: NedoftheHill  (46621 Posts - Joined: Jun 30, 2011)
Posted at 2:45 pm on May 7, 2026
View Single

JCPOA + destruction of their nuclear facilities + destruction of much of their conventional power + destruction of their power projecting proxies such as Hamas & Hezbollah >> just JCPOA, right?

We can all look forward to the spin on that.

__
Actually, neither of us should admit anything yet. Why don't we just wait and see before trying to turn this into a domestic political gain for an election?


Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good.
Thread Level: 3

You are absolutely correct.

Author: PaND  (3295 Posts - Joined: Dec 5, 2022)
Posted at 4:17 pm on May 7, 2026
View Single

I suspect the Iran fan boys are going to be greatly disappointed.

Thread Level: 3

Uh, yea, except they now know they can bring the world to its knees.

Author: Chris94  (38715 Posts - Original UHND Member)
Posted at 4:05 pm on May 7, 2026
View Single

There is a reason that Trump is about to back down.

Thread Level: 3

Paging Dr. Spin...that's all you do. All this to get a JCPOA like agreement. While Americans pay

Author: Quest4twelve  (7509 Posts - Joined: Aug 5, 2015)
Posted at 4:02 pm on May 7, 2026
View Single

though the nose in gas, risking US lives in combat, etc. Go ahead and be proud of that "accomplishment".

Thread Level: 2

I’m looking forward to the spin

Author: Chris94  (38715 Posts - Original UHND Member)
Posted at 2:07 pm on May 7, 2026
View Single

Leaks regarding the 1-page MOU make it sound pretty darn familiar - including billions in sanctions relief and unfrozen funds.

Thread Level: 3

The great negotiator will hammer out an artful deal, a deal never seen before.

Author: jimbasil  (54497 Posts - Joined: Nov 15, 2007)
Posted at 2:08 pm on May 7, 2026
View Single

(no message)

Jack, he is a banker
and Jane, she is a clerk
Thread Level: 4

We can probably assume he at least won't fund their terrorism.

Author: NedoftheHill  (46621 Posts - Joined: Jun 30, 2011)
Posted at 2:46 pm on May 7, 2026
View Single

(no message)

This message has been edited 1 time(s).

Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good.
Thread Level: 5

Well, we can all assume is he has made it far more than likely the US will be attacked within our

Author: jimbasil  (54497 Posts - Joined: Nov 15, 2007)
Posted at 6:06 pm on May 7, 2026
View Single

borders by Iranian terrorist groups or supporters of Iranian regime. Not only has he fired up the zealots he has also
broken down US security and intelligence. He has made sure the US is weak at our borders and ports.


Jack, he is a banker
and Jane, she is a clerk
Thread Level: 5

Ha! The reports I have seen suggest bllions of unfrozen assets.

Author: Chris94  (38715 Posts - Original UHND Member)
Posted at 4:04 pm on May 7, 2026
View Single

(no message)


Consent Management

Close
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • RSS