(no message)
They were allowed to enrich to 3.67% and no further. LEU, not HEU. You can use the former for power production and other research-related stuff.
Then Trump canceled the JCPOA for no reason. Then, enrichment.
(no message)
The verification measures were extensive.
environmental tests for indications of possible enrichment activity anywhere in the country. Iran was complying with the agreement...until Trump pulled the U.S. out...that's when the enrichment increased to 60%.
(no message)
So no, the pallet of cash strategy was a complete failure.
Yeah, it must have been their money returned to them that made them do it.
(no message)
if you think they are going to agree to a deal w/o any type of assets unfrozen you're bat shit cra cra!
And then resume enriching uranium on pursuit of a bomb.
Only way out of this permanently is regime change.
(no message)
JCPOA + destruction of their nuclear facilities + destruction of much of their conventional power + destruction of their power projecting proxies such as Hamas & Hezbollah >> just JCPOA, right?
We can all look forward to the spin on that.
__
Actually, neither of us should admit anything yet. Why don't we just wait and see before trying to turn this into a domestic political gain for an election?
I suspect the Iran fan boys are going to be greatly disappointed.
There is a reason that Trump is about to back down.
though the nose in gas, risking US lives in combat, etc. Go ahead and be proud of that "accomplishment".
Leaks regarding the 1-page MOU make it sound pretty darn familiar - including billions in sanctions relief and unfrozen funds.
(no message)
(no message)
borders by Iranian terrorist groups or supporters of Iranian regime. Not only has he fired up the zealots he has also
broken down US security and intelligence. He has made sure the US is weak at our borders and ports.
(no message)
Consent Management