So DJT says the pope doesn’t understand that Iran can’t have nuclear weapons. WHO was it
that broke the JCPOA deal that was in place and has now cost hundreds of billions of dollars and killed US lives, crushed the US and global economy, handed US global strategic advantage to China and Russia?
Donald J Trump did this yet it’s the Pope who doesn’t get it.
This is the dumbfuckery that passes for brilliance in the MAGACULTbowel-movement!
Go ahead baron and the rest you MAGAmorons, square that round peg!
Trump - “I’m all about the gospel”.
Replies to: “So DJT says the pope doesn’t understand that Iran can’t have nuclear weapons. WHO was it”
JCPOA doesn’t end Iran nuclear weapon program. It is just a pause at best.
You obviously don’t understand JCPOA. So your logic doesn’t make sense.
JCPOA is a bad deal. But it doesn’t justify a war on Iran. Trump’s war on Iran is bad and stupid. But it doesn’t mean JCPOA is a good solution.
Why do you always post wrong information. Now we’ve spent billions and billions on a war
that won’t accomplish much of anything when the bullshitter negotiator finally stops bombing other than ruin the US economy and give Russia and China the upper hand in global affairs.
You should always remember before you post, you’re a dumbass.
That is false. 100% false. I’ll explain one last time.
Every single arms control agreement in history has had a sunset clause. SALT was 8 years. The NPT is 5.
These deals do not expire - they are renegotiated and renewed. I promise you that was the assumption for the JCPOA. Neither side expected it to expire; neither side saw this as a temporary measure.
It is a false narrative.
“they are renegotiated and renewed” You proved my “expired” point is correct. Thank you.
What leverage you have by then to renegotiate and renew with Iran after sunset clause? You already used/exchanged sanctions with a deal of 10-15 year pause.
Both sides expected it to be renewed.
That is, if both sides lived up to their promises.
One side did. We didn’t.
Trust me on this one, Eli. Or don’t. But keep in mind that I teach a class called “weapons of mass destruction” - which, as I tell students, is a great class to take if you hate people.
I know a little about arms control.
“Both sides” is problematic. The accurate term is “the moderate side of Iran and US side”.
There is a strong hardliner side in Iran. Iran is a strange country and no countries including China and Russia like Iran. But I will talk about that next time. The point to you here is no matter how good you’re on the subject of WMD, if you don’t understand Iran’s internal political affairs which is deeply divided and fail to link it to your nuclear agreement, i.e., you treat Iran as one united side, you will make mistakes.
That is an opinion, based on nothing. The hardliners were on board with the JCPOA.
(no message)
Thats a fact. I’ll give you the fact later. JCPOA is Khamenei‘s call by balancing both sides of Iran
(no message)
It’s hard to overcome willful ignorance…
(no message)
3. JCPOA didn’t touch Iran’s nuclear delivery system, i.e. its missile program which is what Iran
has been focusing on. Just ask Israel how bad it is by Iran’s missiles this time. Israel punish anyone who show pictures of damages by Iran’s attack (5 years prison). Also, all 14 US ME military bases were hit very bad by Iran’s missiles and drones.
This is true. But irrelevant.
No deal the United States is going to ever get will limit Iran’s missiles.
They are not scary without nuclear warheads, however.
2. Limits on the amount of low-enriched uranium and the level of enrichment would expire on 2031
after 15 years from 2015. Iran will completely be free to make nuclear weapons since then.
1. JCPOA’s restrictions on the number & type of centrifuges Iran can operate were set to end on 2026
after 10 years from 2015. Iran would be allowed to have more advanced centrifuge research and increase enrichment after 2026.
This Pope is much more moderate than Francis
But even the MAGA “Catholics” choose DJT over him every time.
But it’s not a cult.
If you want to create a Catholic government, let's talk.
I guarantee Democrats would walk away from the table first. You aren't even Catholic, and you think the abortion issue is humorous, as you have said many times.
Like Tyrone, you are just trying to use the Catholic religion as a political lever to get people to vote Democrat. Party first.
Using military force to remove an existential threat (that threat in this case being something the Iranians publicly state as their goal) is potentially justifiable under Catholic Doctrine. The Pope properly calls for peace and restraint. Two things can be true at once. You ignore this nuance because it runs counter to your TDS.
You choose Trump over the Pope. Spin it however you like.
(no message)
Incorrect, of course. Although we know you choose party over Catholicism. Deny that.
(no message)
Yesh, right Mr. Christian Taliban man.
(no message)
Not sure that’s fair to the Taliban
Say what you want about the Taliban, Dude. But at least they have an ethos.
False personal attacks just show the weakness of your position.
(no message)
A Trumper “trumpeting” (pun intended) party first…comical
(no message)
No one has identified anything incorrect about my post.
(no message)
Consent Management