In fairness to the orange cunt, he is “semi-focused” on Iran. Now on to kowtowing to Xi.
I will pray for you.
Makes sense.
(no message)
It s a recipe for disaster.
...e.g., by stopping Iran from having nuclear weapons.
Also, if he publicly indicates a cavalier position toward gas prices, he strengthens our negotiating position with Iran. Iran's strategy is to last through their own suffering until people like you can weaken the negotiating position of the United States and allow a better peace settlement for Iran. I think the war would go more quickly, and resolve more favorably for the US, if you and Dem leadership didn't try to help Iran, but this is a free country. We don't have a king.
(no message)
But they will be disappointed in the end.
(no message)
I suppose Democrats also have protected 70% or Iran’s missile capacity, and have made its leadership realize that it has the world by the balls.
Stupid Democrats!
you guys are ineffective as usual.
(no message)
....that would be the real drama queen here. I am just pointing out for whom Chris is cheering and working to help.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
If he speaks out against Trump. He’s gutless.
(no message)
(no message)
Trump blew up JCPOA, because Obama made a joke about Trump at a White House Correspondents Dinner.
And after his Amateur Hour negotiations team couldn’t orchestrate a similar arrangement, Trump unlawfully committed our nation to war, thinking Iran was Venezuela. That decision has been a colossal and expensive mistake. Fact.
And no Ned, the war hasn’t diminished Iran’s nuclear capability. To the contrary. And we have not won hearts ‘n minds. Hence, Trump has endangered US citizens.
Yet, you insist test it’s the Democrats’ fault because we are not enthusiastic cheerleaders.
Just stop taking Iran's position.
If the goal was to protect Americans, why would you rip up an agreement and give them carte blanche?
The agreement ensured Iran would get the bomb.
If Iran wasn't chanting Death to America at every rally, this may have been ok. But they do, and it is not.
Also, your side funded Oct. 7th with that agreement. Only anti-semites could defend that.
Stupid motherfucker. I’m on record in support of bombing the hell out of Iran. I suppose that’s helping them.
And I did say he was semi-focused on Iran during his asinine comment. Reading comprehension, dipshit.
Have a nice day.
I suppose it is possible that while you understand bombing, you are unaware of basic negotiation tactics. That is the impression you are giving.
Dumb ass. And quit making shit up.
Rooney is right. You’re a worthless poster.
(no message)
He’s more than likely too busy worrying about the ball room and the arch. You know…mission essential items.
a disingenuous post taking his words out of context to make it look as if he doesn't care that people are suffering the economic consequences for preventing Iran from getting nuclear capability.. Even though the Iranian nuclear threat is a problem enabled by liberal policy and kicking of the can down the road until a real leader finally addressed it before it was too late.
And if you replace Trump with another liberal, they will give Iran everything they including the possibility of reparations. Thus you are helping Iran. 100% Deeds > words.....and you're full of words.
(no message)
Trump said what he said. He answered the reporter’s question. He’s focused on Iran, not on people’s financial situations, even though his actions adversely affects them.
What I post on a message board hardly undermines Trump.
Just crying out in the wilderness? Just emoting to for your own emotional reasons??
(no message)
But I highly doubt they have any effect on the orange cunt. Hell, he couldn’t care less about US citizens financial situation…just ask him.
(no message)
(no message)
Consent Management