They asked for $19/month.
They failed to disclose how much of that $19 goes to support hate organizations.
That is one of the reasons they were investigated ... not telling donors their money was being donated, by the millions, to hate organizations. Looks like they haven't yet learned how fraud works.
(no message)
get even with the SPLC…
More taxpayer money spent in the wrong direction.
Link: https://abc7news.com/post/splc-indictment-alabama-civil-rights-groups-respond-southern-poverty-law-center-funding-allegations/18960110/
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
taxpayer money to fund DJT's Malignant Narcissistic need to hurt anyone who doesn't bow, or grease his palms...and for some God Only Knows reason, you side with him...
Nah. I’m sure it is a coincidence that they happen to have led investigations into the groups that attacked the Capitol.
Forgive and forget. That’s Trump’s motto.
(no message)
(no message)
11 counts of wire fraud, false statements, and conspiracy to commit money laundering for allegedly misusing over $3 million in donations to fund individuals associated with violent extremist groups, including the Ku Klux Klan. This indictment highlights a significant deception where donor funds intended to combat extremism were instead funneled to the very groups the SPLC claimed to oppose.
There, I googled it for you. I kind of figured everyone knew about this, but I guess not?
(no message)
Link: https://youtu.be/q8y4S2R9QPc?si=UKHkaSSvX8Vk8Hux
(no message)
...doesn't mean Trump will do the same. But, if he does, he is making the playing field level. You want a level playing field, right?
[I don't watch many videos that are posted here in general. Moreover, Jim usually doesn't know what is going on, or have any understanding of any given discussion. He certainly cannot formulate and/or type out a logical argument (premise, premise, conclusion)...or perhaps he just chooses not to do so. Either way, given that fact, I didn't even open up his post or click on the link, so I have no idea what his point is. That is the reason for any silence on my part. If he wants to talk to me, he can post here in his own words (not with AI) instead of directing me to watch a 15 minute video which may or may not have anything to do with what we are talking about.]
it OK for you to just ignore your opponents comments and evidence and stick to just your own opinion? How about listening to Rep. Raskin's statements that directly address the issue at hand...the SPLC...instead of deflecting to made up and unsubstantiated distractions....(go ahead a shock me by agreeing to do that ;-))
Consent Management