There were just 2 possibilities for how the libs would be posting about the primary results:
1) If Trump candidates lost, there would be ecstatic joy and much mockery with proclamations that Make America Great Again is dead.
2) If Trump won, then the party has no room in its tent for dissent and is headed for "utter collapse" (even though the majority of people voting wanted Trump's agenda implemented, and these candidates blocked it).
Meanwhile, did you notice that Trump's most vocal, radical Dem critic in congress (Al Green) also lost his primary in Texas?
Replies to: “There were just 2 possibilities for how the libs would be posting about the primary results:”
On a happy note for Dems, Al Green's cane could be enshrined at the Smithsonian.
One can only dream.
He needs to remember to reroute his orders of Soul Glo from Washington to Texas.
(no message)
I keep hearing Trump in not popular anymore. Low ratings is the talking point. I mean the
Polls are always right. Six Gender Jimmy is not running in California. Do you see a vegan tapping into the good ol boy network in Texas?
Trump's "popularity" has always been limited. He wins because the Dems went off the deep end
on so many issues. Same is true with these primaries.
Staying God is non-binary is sure to hit home with many Texans. If the Dems would
Find someone middle of the road, they would do well. Instead, they keep propping up these candidates who support the 20% side of issues.
Low Testosterone James Talarico is a mirrored reflection of the anti-Magas here & at these "rallies"
(no message)
Who cares about anything you typed. Cult phenomena wins the headlines.
(no message)
Consent Management