Caveat emptor.
Before Trump nobody would have batted an eye at this. Guarantee you know California politician is going to claim fraud when the election's over.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Yes? And what is your proof that there is fraud?
Even you have to admit that it looks suspicious. There has to be a better way with the technology that exists today.
As jakers pointed out, large chunks of votes all breaking one way? Flip it around and you know there would be the same reaction.
It prevents, you know, c h e a t i n g.
(no message)
But of course, like 2020, Courts don’t operate on Earth II bullshit.
You are a trafficker in falsehoods. And a horrible American.
I must be a horrible American in your mind for not accepting the bastardization of the democratic election process by the communists controlling Las Angeles.
(no message)
I'm sure that all tracks are well covered. Don't worry. Just another election count that turned slow as things got tight with the Mail In results going the far Left's way. I am sure that is coincidence. Nothing to see here. Move along.
Entire states can count their votes in half the time as one city...but you know, that is probably just because of the DEI hiring policies, right?
And the Left's support of Mail In balloting and no Voter Id are COMPLETELY unrelated to this type of occurrence.
(no message)
Because you seem to be making the same kind of assumptions as you imply that I am. Do you see yourself as getting special privilege in that regard, Junior?
Of course you do.
And your “word salads” ain’t clever, bud. Just stop making a fool of yourself…if that’s possible. No offense intended.
86 47 was a nefarious message by James Comey!
Show me specifics.
(Yes, I'm having fun playing your game).
My bad and you haven’t the skill to play my game. You’re not tough enough. Again, no offense intended
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Votes. Nothing to see here, move along.
(no message)
(no message)
Consent Management