MTG calls Trump a traitor over efforts to block the Epstein files…
MTG also texted Trump that her son’s life was being threatened. Trump texted her back and said, “He deserves it..”
Replies to: “MTG calls Trump a traitor over efforts to block the Epstein files…”
I’m with MTG. Few understand the implication of Epstein case - How corrupted our country has become.
I’m referring to political implication. His crime of international sex trafficking network of underage girls is pretty straightforward.
The fact we have Epstein who can use his access to money, elite networking, and the compromising material of others to ensure his network of powerful politicians and business titans protected his interests and silenced scrutiny is shocking.
Releasing Epstein file is a perfect starting point to drain swamp and clear out Washington D.C.. This, actually was a cornerstone of Trump’s political platform. So, I am with MTG. Trump changed. Because he found the swamp is useful for his presidency.
Trump certainly is clean from Epstein file. Otherwise Merrick Garland wouldn’t pass this golden chance to destroy him.
It turned out Massie is the one who truly wants to drain swamp.
“Clean” from the Epstein files? Is protecting his friends and delaying…
The release of the Epstein files “clean?”
Agree with everything else you said.
Again you need to ask Garland why he didn’t pursue broader prosecutions tied to Epstein's network,
especially if Trump is included in this network. For such an important case why he only gave a 2-page memo saying no uncharged third parties would be prosecuted?
On this topic Trump is bad, but Biden is worse. You should have had BDS before TDS. Where were you in Biden’s 4 years? It’s not long time ago.
Because he knew there was nothing there to implicate trump.
(no message)
The Epstein files were still being investigated during the Biden administration..:
That all stopped under Trump. Bondi and her team redacted a good portion of the files to protect Trump. Trump is mentioned in the files. Biden is not.
I don't think Trump intended any offense.
(no message)
Did he say “No offense intended”? Because that does absolve everything….
(no message)
Indeed. Strange that I didn't have to explain my post to you.
DFH, ShowMe and Jim probably think you are just another MAGA cultist defending Trump. [rolleyes]
I am Ultra-MAGA...
...to hyper-partisan dimwits too hysterical and self-absorbed to read or retain anything here these days.
Is there anything from this board that is truly worth retaining?…
Other than my posts, of course.
Nah. Knute ain’t a MAGA dolt.
(no message)
Awe, stupidity to the rescue.
(no message)
One person who responded to me accurately assessed the intent of my post.
Sorry, but it was not you.
Actually, reading DFH's last post referencing whataboutism, where he seems to think I'm defending Trump, I'm not sure he got my point either. Oh well.
Definitely not. He was just being Trump. Isn’t that the excuse you people use?
(no message)
Good ol' Uncle Joe, er, I mean Don!
Go easy on him. He had a stutter when he was a kid.
Whatabout Biden? Why is it that you can’t just admit that Trump is an idiot who….
Says idiotic things? I know you can do it.
Saying idiotic things sits too close to home for anti-Trump dolts. They live it & breath it.
(no message)
Unoriginal and untrue. Try being more creative in the future. Thank you in advance
(no message)
Oh, it's true alright. Anti-Maga dolts do in fact relate to idiotic comments & candidates.
You're just too close to the action to realize it.
This is a perfect Whatabout Biden. He even didn’t dare to say releasing Epstein file
He had no courage to open this can of worms.
You obviously didn't do any research before posting...here's why the Biden admin couldn't release
the Epstein Files...
If you disagree, then provide substantive evidence that proves your opinion.
------------------------
AI Overview
Ghislaine Maxwell’s ongoing appeals and active litigation—which kept key evidence and investigative files under judicial seal—served as the primary legal barrier preventing the comprehensive release of the Epstein files during the Biden administration. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Legal & Procedural Roadblocks
• Active Appeals: Following her December 2021 conviction, Maxwell's extensive appellate process meant that evidence and case files remained sealed by court order to protect the integrity of ongoing litigation. This process ultimately extended to her petition to the U.S. Supreme Court, which was not denied until October 2025. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
• Open Investigations: Throughout the 2021–2025 term, the Justice Department maintained active investigations and grand juries surrounding Epstein's network. Releasing raw evidence files while cases remain open risks compromising witness cooperation and future prosecutions. [1, 2, 3]
• Separation of Powers: The executive branch cannot unilaterally override judicial protective orders or seals without specific legislative mandates. Targeted batches of records were unsealed during the Biden administration (such as the January 2024 releases), but they were the result of specific court orders in settled civil litigation, rather than a sweeping administrative declassification. [1, 2]
Subsequent Legislative Action
The blanket restrictions only shifted after Maxwell’s appeals concluded and Congress intervened. Lawmakers passed the bipartisan Epstein Files Transparency Act, which became law in November 2025. This legislation legally forced the Department of Justice to bypass traditional administrative delays and unseal over 3 million pages of investigative files, images, and videos (with victim identities redacted), leading to massive public disclosures managed by the subsequent administration. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]
-------------------
AI posts should be banned.
(no message)
You have a remarkable habit of going hyperbolic instead of thoughtfully replying with a reasoned
reply. Wouldn’t hurt to look into that.
Ned and the rest of these sycophants defend the dumbest person on the planet.
I am sorry, …dumest person, anyway their support may make them dumer? We are testing a really low bar nowadays
I can't recall ever defending Kamala Harris.
Can you imagine if we lived in a country in which the dumbest person on the planet could join the top 1% in wealth in the merit-based private sector? Thank goodness we don't live there yet. You have to make your money as a politician to do that.
Well played
(no message)
.
(no message)
Any other names not currently in government or related to this you want to bring up?
(no message)
As I think about this, Kamala cannot be the dumbest.
That has to be Georgia Representative Hank Johnson.
He was the guy who was worried that Guam might tip over and sink due to too many people being on the island. Surely the entire board can agree he is the dumbest.
And that is saying something, since several dozen Congressman don't know what a woman is...but I suspect they are just lying to us about that.
Consent Management