(no message)

Link: https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2026/jul/09/republicans-ask-wnba-to-protect-caitlin-clark-from-possible-racially-motivated-attacks

Caitlin is being targeted by the black players, but it is unworthy of Congressional intervention.

Advice to Caitlin: If you can't handle the heat .... get out of the kitchen.

Advice to the black girls: You are getting paid more ... because of Caitlin. Thank her. Show class.

This should be investigated, but not by the government.

(no message)

(no message)

Link: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/07/05/us/politics/trump-dei-order-eeoc-discrimination.html

(no message)

(no message)

Link: https://www.sportico.com/personalities/athletes/2025/caitlin-clark-wnba-salary-sponsors-1234878215/

(no message)

(no message)

(no message)

Link: https://chicagodefender.com/black-women-built-the-wnba-so-why-arent-they-the-faces-of-it/

(no message)

Agree or disagree, it is a credible source of AA opinion.

(no message)

Do you dismiss racial or sex discrimination claims if everyone in those racial or sex categories at a particular business or industry is not discriminated against?

(no message)

A story about a child rapist being helped by the Left ... you knee-jerk defend that.

A story about a woman being regularly attacked in the workplace ... you knee-jerk defend the company and the attackers.

The WSJ has an article today stating that since Oct. 7, 70% of religious attacks in Canada have been against Jews, 1% of the population. Responses from the prime minister and the mayor of Toronto? Fight Islamophobia: The article is about suicidal empathy, an example of which is "whenever Jews are attacked, Western leaders should urge us to redouble our efforts to defeat Islamophobia. To do otherwise would be mean, racist, bigoted.”

You are doing the same thing. You can somehow virtue signal (perversely), by sympathizing with violent attackers (why? skin color???), and look down on the Right when it seeks justice for victims (who are not members of groups you want to protect).

You are exhibiting a pattern. Ask yourself why.

(no message)

Saying the sky is green when everyone sees it is purple will not work for you. You defended him (admittedly with fallacious logic), and then said you didn't defend him.

The Democrat governor pardoned him, and now you defend him. Or, are you prepared to condemn Walz for pardoning the child rapist? I don't think you are ready to do that. Party first, even before children.

defend at the same time 🤡

I'll try again: Clark may indeed face racial discrimination, even if she is the only white player experiencing such racial discrimination. Is this really such a mind-boggling concept for you?

(no message)

(no message)

(no message)