Is this serious? GOP rush to investigate Caitlin Clark racial rough play.
Replies to: “Is this serious? GOP rush to investigate Caitlin Clark racial rough play.”
Perhaps they should investigate ICE and let the WNBA police their league.
Caitlin is being targeted by the black players, but it is unworthy of Congressional intervention.
Advice to Caitlin: If you can't handle the heat .... get out of the kitchen.
Advice to the black girls: You are getting paid more ... because of Caitlin. Thank her. Show class.
If Caitlin wasn't white, my opinion of her wouldn't change but yours would.
Who has a problem here?
She’s getting fouled hard because she’s a great player and because she’s white…
This should be investigated, but not by the government.
Agreed. But, the government does investigate workplace racism.
(no message)
It used to, Ned.
It still does, conor. Just for example, anti-semitism at universities.
While not a "workplace" the government halted racism at universities in the past and largely succeeded. O say "largely" because now the pendulum is swinging towards other races, and the government is investigating those instances of racism under Trump...they were ignored under previous administrations.
Why do you think they are attacking her?
(no message)
She's only been playing for a couple of years, yet she's pulling in $16M/yr from endorsements...
Why do you think that is?
(no message)
She secured nice endorsements. That certainly warrants a beating.
From all reports she has increased the visibility of the league and upped everyone’s earning potential.
Clearly demands she be physically put in her place…
The Mannings collectively need their asses beaten next…
C'mon, Ned...you don't need spoon feeding...what do you think the post means?
(no message)
You don't answer because you don't like the answer.
(no message)
Resentment. The perception of injustice.
Hensou going for the win on who can be the most 🤡. Stellar documentation my dude.
(no message)
The Chicago Defender is an African American Newspaper.
Agree or disagree, it is a credible source of AA opinion.
The premise of your question is 🤡 like. It's sports...do all white woman get attacked in the WNBA?
(no message)
That's brilliant thinking.
Do you dismiss racial or sex discrimination claims if everyone in those racial or sex categories at a particular business or industry is not discriminated against?
So anyway, in regards to the WNBA prove me wrong as I won't entertainment your strawman
(no message)
Look what you are doing on this page.
A story about a child rapist being helped by the Left ... you knee-jerk defend that.
A story about a woman being regularly attacked in the workplace ... you knee-jerk defend the company and the attackers.
The WSJ has an article today stating that since Oct. 7, 70% of religious attacks in Canada have been against Jews, 1% of the population. Responses from the prime minister and the mayor of Toronto? Fight Islamophobia: The article is about suicidal empathy, an example of which is "whenever Jews are attacked, Western leaders should urge us to redouble our efforts to defeat Islamophobia. To do otherwise would be mean, racist, bigoted.”
You are doing the same thing. You can somehow virtue signal (perversely), by sympathizing with violent attackers (why? skin color???), and look down on the Right when it seeks justice for victims (who are not members of groups you want to protect).
You are exhibiting a pattern. Ask yourself why.
Your very first sentence is a lie. Have you on shame like Baron?
(no message)
Your 4 bullet points are an attempt to defend him.
Saying the sky is green when everyone sees it is purple will not work for you. You defended him (admittedly with fallacious logic), and then said you didn't defend him.
The Democrat governor pardoned him, and now you defend him. Or, are you prepared to condemn Walz for pardoning the child rapist? I don't think you are ready to do that. Party first, even before children.
I don't find playing pretend stupid fun, have fun with your game. Can't call someone a 'sicko' and
defend at the same time 🤡
Typical patterns for you: 1) Post & run away; or 2) Post, insult & run away.
But, most interestingly, you always defend the aggressor in a conflict, not the victim. That is shameful.
You don't understand what a strawman is.
I'll try again: Clark may indeed face racial discrimination, even if she is the only white player experiencing such racial discrimination. Is this really such a mind-boggling concept for you?
Nice try, start your own thread. Don't GOP nobodies have anything else do to do yes or no?
(no message)
Got it. It really is mind-boggling for you.
(no message)
Why do you think they are attacking her? The question has no premise.
(no message)
Consent Management