Is this serious? GOP rush to investigate Caitlin Clark racial rough play.
Replies to: “Is this serious? GOP rush to investigate Caitlin Clark racial rough play.”
Perhaps they should investigate ICE and let the WNBA police their league.
Caitlin is being targeted by the black players, but it is unworthy of Congressional intervention.
Advice to Caitlin: If you can't handle the heat .... get out of the kitchen.
Advice to the black girls: You are getting paid more ... because of Caitlin. Thank her. Show class.
If Caitlin wasn't white, my opinion of her wouldn't change but yours would.
Who has a problem here?
Speak for yourself Hayseed. You’re not a victim. Neither is Caitlin.
(no message)
Clark has drawn 23% of the league’s flagrant fouls. That is absurd..
(no message)
Caitlin needs to suffer for Conor's white guilt.
(no message)
Checkmate!
(no message)
1) Assess an opinion, 2) Use said opinion to create a "fact", impressive...
(no message)
I asked who had a problem here and you raised your hand.
Noted.
WTF are you talking about?
(no message)
Takeaway: You are too stupid to realize how stupid you are.
(no message)
You're easily trigged, but I'm not telling you anything you don't already know.
(no message)
I didn't like having to state the obvious, yet you enthusiastically prove it.
(no message)
Sure thing Edgar Allen Poe...like you're writing poems to me now. So weird..
(no message)
Quoth the Raven: Nevermore.
(no message)
She’s getting fouled hard because she’s a great player and because she’s white…
This should be investigated, but not by the government.
Agreed. But, the government does investigate workplace racism.
(no message)
This situation doesn’t warrant a federal investigation, imo. The league should be able…
To handle this by themselves.
Agreed. And yet the league doesn't handle it, b/c it doesn't want it to stop.
Same with universities in the South decades ago. The government had to step in there, I assume you agree. This was because the racism was encouraged by the university and state leaders. Same with the WNBA. They all should handle this, but they don't want handle it.
It used to, Ned.
It still does, conor. Just for example, anti-semitism at universities.
While not a "workplace" the government halted racism at universities in the past and largely succeeded. O say "largely" because now the pendulum is swinging towards other races, and the government is investigating those instances of racism under Trump...they were ignored under previous administrations.
Why do you think they are attacking her?
(no message)
She's only been playing for a couple of years, yet she's pulling in $16M/yr from endorsements...
Why do you think that is?
(no message)
She secured nice endorsements. That certainly warrants a beating.
From all reports she has increased the visibility of the league and upped everyone’s earning potential.
Clearly demands she be physically put in her place…
The Mannings collectively need their asses beaten next…
C'mon, Ned...you don't need spoon feeding...what do you think the post means?
(no message)
You don't answer because you don't like the answer.
(no message)
Guess you do need spoon feeding...IMO if Caitlin weren't making Top Dollar she wouldn't be
getting roughed up...and she wouldn't be making $16M/yr in endorsements if she weren't setting scoring records. Many in the WNBA have languished for years with paltry earnings and now this newcomer out-earns them all. It's about Envy and Jealousy...not race.
Btw, I've seen a Blonde, Pony Tailed opponent give her a very hard shove.
Resentment. The perception of injustice.
Hensou going for the win on who can be the most 🤡. Stellar documentation my dude.
(no message)
The Chicago Defender is an African American Newspaper.
Agree or disagree, it is a credible source of AA opinion.
The premise of your question is 🤡 like. It's sports...do all white woman get attacked in the WNBA?
(no message)
That's brilliant thinking.
Do you dismiss racial or sex discrimination claims if everyone in those racial or sex categories at a particular business or industry is not discriminated against?
So anyway, in regards to the WNBA prove me wrong as I won't entertainment your strawman
(no message)
Look what you are doing on this page.
A story about a child rapist being helped by the Left ... you knee-jerk defend that.
A story about a woman being regularly attacked in the workplace ... you knee-jerk defend the company and the attackers.
The WSJ has an article today stating that since Oct. 7, 70% of religious attacks in Canada have been against Jews, 1% of the population. Responses from the prime minister and the mayor of Toronto? Fight Islamophobia: The article is about suicidal empathy, an example of which is "whenever Jews are attacked, Western leaders should urge us to redouble our efforts to defeat Islamophobia. To do otherwise would be mean, racist, bigoted.”
You are doing the same thing. You can somehow virtue signal (perversely), by sympathizing with violent attackers (why? skin color???), and look down on the Right when it seeks justice for victims (who are not members of groups you want to protect).
You are exhibiting a pattern. Ask yourself why.
Your very first sentence is a lie. Have you on shame like Baron?
(no message)
Your 4 bullet points are an attempt to defend him.
Saying the sky is green when everyone sees it is purple will not work for you. You defended him (admittedly with fallacious logic), and then said you didn't defend him.
The Democrat governor pardoned him, and now you defend him. Or, are you prepared to condemn Walz for pardoning the child rapist? I don't think you are ready to do that. Party first, even before children.
I don't find playing pretend stupid fun, have fun with your game. Can't call someone a 'sicko' and
defend at the same time 🤡
Typical patterns for you: 1) Post & run away; or 2) Post, insult & run away.
But, most interestingly, you always defend the aggressor in a conflict, not the victim. That is shameful.
As I just replied to cheeks, your opinion or intentional miscomprehending doesn't = facts
No matter how many times you feed yourself BS it will never. Point out the exact part of my message that "defends" the child rapist?
Doubling down on not smart enough to know how stupid you are... Hahahaha.
(no message)
Hahahaha.
(no message)
You don't understand what a strawman is.
I'll try again: Clark may indeed face racial discrimination, even if she is the only white player experiencing such racial discrimination. Is this really such a mind-boggling concept for you?
Nice try, start your own thread. Don't GOP nobodies have anything else do to do yes or no?
(no message)
Got it. It really is mind-boggling for you.
(no message)
Why do you think they are attacking her? The question has no premise.
(no message)
Dan Patrick said that the WNBA Commish accepted an invite to appear on his show.
No softball questions. Then she never showed and two hours later the WNBA put out a statement that the PR Dept didn't want her to appear. Cowards.
Consent Management