(no message)
Whatever happened to embracing basic truths?
Link: https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2021/08/29/how-climate-change-helped-make-hurricane-ida-one-louisianas-worst/
the article it came from...https://earth.org/data_visualization/a-brief-history-of-co2/
Add to this the following recent data on CO2 concentration as well as Global Tropospheric Temperature data...both of which are recognized by all parties as being authoritative...
https://gml.noaa.gov/ccgg/trends/
https://www.drroyspencer.com/wp-content/uploads/UAH_LT_1979_thru_July_2021_v6.jpg
Bottom line...the planetary CO2 atmospheric concentration used to be in balance...with the advent of fossil fuel consumption, it isn't any longer...we keep adding to it...year after year...it is a greenhouse gas (no argument against that)...it takes ~30 yrs to remove half of the CO2 that's added each year, but centuries for the remainder...
For added insight, Google David J.C. MacKay's book "Sustainable Energy - Without the Hot Air"...no hyperbole...just factual data.
Just saying...since you brought up the subject.
back with help of our potential DNA clone technology. Isn't it fun to have a real-life Jurassic Park?
Change doesn't make you want to shift away from burning fossil fuels, then reflect on British Petroleum's latest estimate of how long world oil reserves will last at current consumption levels...which is 53 years...not too surprising actually, when you realize that we now have to squeeze oil and gas out of rocks to get them...but that's just my take...and a few others.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
concentrations, atmospheric temperatures go up...ice caps melt, etc...and the climate changes forcing major adjustments for humans at a rapid pace...not something we need...or do you not see any problem here?
Oh, and all the while, plants do continue to process CO2...we agree on that.
(no message)
(no message)
Trumpian of you...
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)