(no message)
Or are you just staying with "you have anger issues!"
I realize that second homes (e.g. Mar-a-Lago, Kennebunkport) are only meant for wealthy white folks in your America, but Martha’s Vineyard has long been the summer retreat for Jewish and black Americans, above and beyond Americans of all socio-economic/racial/religious segments. Plenty of old money conservative WASPS as well.
We much prefer Nantucket. But, both islands are resilient and resourceful, self sustaining and very environmentally conscious. Both islands have plenty of clean water, farms and fish. My healthiest and tastiest meals are enjoyed on Nantucket.
Not sure why so many posters believe that a former US President should live in a cardboard box in the Bronx as opposed to a nice home in Martha’s Vineyard?
Regarding your assertion that nuclear power should be center stage in the climate change conversation, we all agree and have repeatedly said so. Chris, Tyrone, myself, wholeheartedly agree with your premise.
Nevertheless, the threshold starting point is that (1) climate change/global warming is real, (2) is the result of substantially increased concentrations of greenhouse gases from human activity (i.e. burning fossil fuels), and (3) the science dictates an urgent response.
The better question is whether it a good thing for any of them to do it.
(no message)
he just answered the questions in your last rant...(aside from the communism denial thing...if you really want to go there).
As for my take on the matter, he's spot on when it comes to Climate Change and Nuclear Power.
(no message)
Got any stories of your dad hanging with Elvis at the premiere of Grease?
(no message)