(no message)
in monitoring global average air temperatures, they all are facts though. These alternative global metrics that quantify climate change are discussed and debated all the time. People may have one preferred data source and even are biased to view it as standard source to draw their conclusion and prediction. But nobody ridicule the other sources as not "alternative facts".
The real shame is you're becoming more and more like a drama queen, just like your bro jimbasil.
(no message)
Talking about temperature. Unfortunately they were talking about something that many observed and didn't really care about until this whacko decides to make it the major topic for his first couple days in office. He controls the agenda right? He controls the White House reaction to photos and stories right? He is either a liar and stupid or weak and a pussy
(no message)
More importantly why did Trump pitch a hissy fit over a minor issue that he's wrong about....... at the CIA in front of the wall of heros? Asshole.
MLK bust news is very malicious. Although they admitted this mistake by saying it is because people blocked the view, it is very childish explanation.
(no message)
(no message)
the size of crowd at inauguration. Your dramatic reaction on so-called "alternative facts" is what I want to address to, not the size of the crowd which I and scooter both agree is not a big deal thing and we don't care about.
differing stories. Well done. You guys are elusive.
This group is full of whackos. Not alternate facts but bold face liars. I say thank God for the media now. Everyone needs to stand up to this bully; everyone needs to resist getting sucked into his sicko games. Today it's all lies about the IC tomorrow it will be something else and he won't tire of blaming the media. Pathological
I think he works for the Trump admin. Could Neddie actually be Kellyanne Conway? Have we ever seen them together?
I did a quick search, and found you using the term twice. Maybe you could search and find me using the term so I can figure out what you are talking about. Thanks.
The type of facts Libs don't know.
(no message)
All stand against the rampant and bold face lies of Trump and Kelly Ann. This is very dangerous territory and games being played.
(no message)
(no message)
You said I've used the term for years. If you can find one, I might know what you are talking about, and I might be able to respond.
" Libs ignore secondary facts"? And that "secondary fact are more important in most cases"?
It sums up what I've said all along. You guys haven't the huevos stand up to your own rhetoric.
A shame.
Give me an example, so I can comment. If you find an example, I'm sure I'll remember when I see it in context, and I'll be able to comment. If you continue to fail to find an example, I will eventually assume you are making this up.
You to deny what you have posted before.
I'm guessing you can't find any example of me saying "secondary facts"
Why don't we tackle it this way: Can you please put a few coherent sentences together describing what you thought I meant when you heard me say, "secondary facts." If you can do that, then maybe you will jog my memory. (But, probably not. You probably heard something I never intended to say...a common problem people on this board have with you. But, I'm willing to entertain the remote possibility that you are right. I'm just asking you to support your posts.)
By the way, I'm almost done with you in this thread. If you can't explain yourself, we'll just have to let this go. You can just go to sleep tonight, content that you have apparently caught me in some discrepancy of your own creation in your private little imaginary world. I'm happy to give you that small pleasure. Rest assured, that will do no harm to me.
(no message)
And then the board doesn't have to further exposed to this ridiculous sub-thread you started.
By the way: You can't just say "I question your probity" and not have people realize what is going on here. That's what I did at the beginning of this thread. I called you out, and you have been unable to back up your comment. And, no one has come to your aid. Now, you are just going to pretend that you were the one calling me out. You know, people notice these things. You lose credibility. It would have been better if you just said, "I can't find it either, but I remember you saying something like X."
that we don't take into account "secondary facts" the important ones. After all my posts ridiculing you on that very topic you are going to say, this is the first I've heard of it.
You have no honesty and you have no backbone.