Verrrry suspicious. I guess this behavior - which is one of the hallmark pillars of the Left's accusations of Trump wrt Russian ties- puts Obama and Hillary in the same boat.
Oh, as does the "Tell Vlad that I'll have more flexibility after the election". Obama was even on a cozy first name basis! Very suspicious Frank.
The previous admin did the same thing you see. Bush had gone to a very cold policy against Russia, and W warned Obama.
To your knee jerk response of how Russia helped him with the election :
1) The recent Wikileaks revelation that the CIA can leave tracks to make it look like others did the hacking is telling. Trump may have been shown false intel. We can no longer believe anything they have said here. Assange also said it wasn't the Russians, and he has yet to lie. STILL, I WILL GRANT YOU THIS POINT FOR NOW ANYWAYS SINCE IT IS ONLY SUSPICION and point out that:
2) Regardless, the information leaked was only truthful, and americans used their own minds. You are just upset because you didn't get to enjoy your usual one sided advantage with the MSM and their own October Surprise of the Access Hollywood Tape (which was held for years released within 1 month of the election).
Most people don't see the difference between the MSM trying to influence and election for liberals with a truthful tape, and anyone else from anywhere releasing truthful information that reveals that the Clinton Campaign was cheating massively in the primary and debates.
Most people simply care whether the information is fully true or not. It was.
We don't care because it's true, and you apparently don't care that Obama was using Govt surveillance on the Trump campaign and feeding it to Hillary who tweeted about herself at the endo October.
This will all amount to nothing. Obamat isn't going to jail, and Trump isn't getting impeached. But Trump IS still president.
Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Ecx6PPRbDw
(no message)
to worry about. He never thought Trump could win. He also knew once that he did that eventually this info would find it's way to Trump.
Every week now, it's a new Trump associate with a connection to Russian. It's all being choreographed.
That said...Manafort, Stone, Flynn, Sessions and Kushner aren't helping Trump's cause.
Keep in mind Trump attempted to use Benghazi and emails to de-legitimize Clinton's candidacy. Politics are politics.
Those that took down Nixon did so for political reasons...doesn't mean Nixon was innocent.
Trump & Russia.
At least Hillary was guilty of video thing in Benghazi which helped Obama in 2012 election. There is evidence for that. Beyond that, there was no clear evidence to say that Hillary's responsible for attack and fall of Benghazi consulate. R over reached in Benghazi investigation with political purpose.
When it comes to negotiations with a foreign entity, right? Obama was the POTUS when he told that to Putin. The issue for Trump is he may have worked with Putin (his aides certainly did) as a candidate....which is illegal.
(no message)
Who knew?
(no message)
...and not legal for a candidate that does not hold elected office to do so.
That distinction is significant.
I understand that people are utterly blinded by partisanship. I fully grasp confirmation bias and motivated reasoning.
So I sorta get it when 74% of Republicans think that Trump Tower was under surveillance somehow.
But you're a doctor, for pete's sake, trained to recognize causality and sift through bad info. And you are unable to think clearly about any info that conflicts with your political beliefs (or, more accurately, your political party).
As a country, we are in trouble....when Trump goes down, he is going to bring this republic with him.
Daily waves of new Trump friend/associate connections with Russia. Never a solid piece of evidence presented, but the eager audience isn't given time to notice as they shift their attention to the next scandal target.
(no message)
(no message)
And he failed to disclose the award when he joined Obama's White House in 2014:
“Well Podesta should certainly have been more upfront in filling this out. Clearly, it should have been fully disclosed,” said Craig Holman, a lobbyist for the liberal group Public Citizen which was founded by Ralph Nader. “That’s the point of the personal financial disclosure forms, especially for anyone entering the White House,” he told TheDCNF in an interview.
Frank, are you suspicious? Is it time to investigate, indict, convict, and hang?
Link: Clinton cronies makin' a buck
and make head to head comparison in their business deals and transactions:
Trump business vs Clinton Foundation's uranium sale business
Trump campaign people vs HRC campaign people
It may reveal some corrupted or dirty things (Doing business in seriously corrupted countries like Russia and China can be hardly clean, everybody know it), but none of them will be found to collude with Russia. So--called "collusion with enemy" is purely an old fashion false accusation in politics. It is really a shame to play it today.
But that is part of the Democrats' plan.
(no message)
cooked up by the media about Trump.
Fool.
No it's not a connection in and by itself. Evidence! you are a bad attorney if you can't tell evidence from hearsay.
illegally hacking?--please then we would have to make our efforts at hacking them illegal too.
one thing you can't deny. The email are truthful evidence that the DMC and others are fraudulent.
Chelsea, they make a formidable team. Why, I do think they will succeed in squelching anyone who tries to unseat their heirarchal status in the Dem Party.
(no message)