How the 2020 election was rigged and who sponsored it finally revealed.
Of course. Zuckerberg. This is a bombshell. It explains everything…the late night vote counting after sending the R reps home, the suitcases of ballots under the table, the last reporting by the liberal battleground counties so that they knew their targets. But it was all made possible mostly by the changed voting laws that allowed Zuckerberg’s hired Dem activists to harvest the votes without the issue of ID legitimacy. Giving these people access to ballot counting and interpretation was also critical.
This is why the Dem leaders have the media telling their liberal minions to believe that changing the voting rules back to preCOVID would be an atrocity. They can steal any election this way.
Link: https://www.foxnews.com/media/mollie-hemingway-mark-zuckerberg-election-facebook-tucker-carlson
Replies to: How the 2020 election was rigged and who sponsored it finally revealed.
Most of all, they want us to continue to march in lockstep with their dictates.
(no message)
Exhibit 313 — How A Cult Seeks to Destroy Democracy
Here’s a good one for you
Key line: “In a second Trump presidency, however, the burglars will arrive already knowing how to bypass the alarms and disable the locks.”
Link: https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/10/trump-running-president-2024-election/620502/
Interesting that the Atlantic calls Deep State undermining an elected POTUS as "alarms" and "locks".
(no message)
Here’s another beauty -“ Get even with people. If they screw you, screw them back 10 times as hard.
I really believe it.” - Trump on his meaning in life. A rule he lives by.
We’re being fed a series of carefully contrived fictions that bear no resemblance to reality.
(no message)
What? Big Corporate got involved in politics? What’s this country coming to?
I can’t believe a corporation would help register voters and offer services like design of mailing.
Can you imagine the outrage that would happen if the Koch Bros got involved in politics?
Oh by the way your outrage is ridiculous.
Trump is not depressing. He has a personality disorder. He can’t help it.
The millions of Americans who believe this utter nonsense are depressing. Those who should know better.
This is beyond bullshit. It is crazy. And simply fucking stupid.
And this is why our republic is in deep trouble. And why we’ll keep pointing it out, day after day, until the crisis passes (God willing).
So, I take it that you won’t listen to her evidence since your mind is closed.
That’s also the explanation for your politics in general. Which of her facts are you refuting and why? How about we both wait for the book to come out. I am sure at that point, you will have shifted from “This didn’t happen”, to “This didn’t matter” like always. Why? Because the events in various battleground states on election night- including my own - cannot be explained mathematically.
She’s a zealot and a moron. So no, I’m gonna not listen to moron zealots.
And I’m gonna further say that anyone who thinks that Facebook execs rigged a presidential election is an even bigger moron than she is.
EXACTLY what you said about Obama FBI spying on Trump.
That owner of Facebook has been able to single handedly silence the main political voice of the party he opposes with no repercussions. That would never happen either, right?
You know, you really are a pretty good barometer of what is going on if you take the reverse of your answer.
I look at facts. 490 million dollars into groups that buy influence in like minded districts where they are accepted to hyper stimulate voter turn out by cheating. And most importantly, it helps explain many of the irregular phenomenon we saw in the BG states. I agree that it wasn’t the ONLY cheating, but it sounds to be the largest organized effort.
This is why the voter ID laws must be reinstated. You claimed the special voting laws were due only to the pandemic. Now you try to keep them anyways. I think deep down, you know it’s about cheating as well.
Reminder: that didn’t happen
(no message)
Wasn’t finished when you responded…..and stop hiding in hair splitting definitional differences….
….it makes you sound like a bad lawyer.
Investigating is not “spying.” Important distinction. Not splitting hairs.
(no message)
Did Trump know about the "investigation" at the time? And was there secret surveillance?
A rose by any other name...........
Awesome reasoning! Does the public know a lot about ongoing investigations?
(no message)
My point, Chris, is that it was spying. i understand that you might reserve that for foreign targets
but it was spying.
Wrong and clueless as usual.
(no message)
Knowingly using false information to start an investigation and lying on FISA warrants are a crime.
(no message)
She doesn’t have evidence - she has 70 million gullible listeners.
Here’s a hint, you’re one of them.