…….mathematically impossible without outside influence.
Science (statistical probability) would suggest that the reason that so many key races keep coming back so razor close is that the results are being achieved by one side “aiming at the target”.
So, considering the following facts:
-No ID required ballots can be harvested - no way to know if they are real
- large ground effort in place to harvest these (as an aside, big donors have put in hundreds of millions to develop these in friendly county election departments).
- amazingly greater and greater voter turn out every time which would result from such harvesting.
- Non ID Mail in ballots always come in heavily for one side (Dems) even though mail demographic does not otherwise fit this picture).
- heavily Dem blue counties always last to report allowing to ascertain a target vote number needed.
- margins always come back to close the margins for Dems
-MSM, whose heavy bias is both evident well documented, withhold making obvious call late at night affording opportunity to add in late votes.
-MSM also quietly changes the # of votes already counted downward without announcing it to viewers.
McCauliffe was not a candidate that was even in the same ballpark in this election…..and yet here we are at 50/50 again.
The other much more obvious explanation for this 50/50 margin recurrence is voter fraud.
meanwhile, while you're pulling that together, I've appended a link for the rest of the board to peruse which explains why "Mail-in" ballots are secure...and have been for decades.
Link: https://theconversation.com/6-ways-mail-in-ballots-are-protected-from-fraud-145666
They simply can't be secured, and in every industry in the world, that would render it uncertifiable. Our election processes have early voting and an absentee ballot process for those who have potential issues with exercising their right on Election Day. This mail-in process has become such a cottage industry and is having far too profound an effect on election results.
I'll say it again, the ONLY reason to support it so enthusiastically is to have the opportunity to commit fraud. Every other justification in its favor can be served by an alternative that is already available in the process.
(no message)
Yes, mail in voting allows more Americans to vote, making it less cumbersome for folks with limited wherewithal. A good thing, yes?
Why assume that "blue" precincts are more prone to cheat anymore than "red" precincts? Why assume that election officials and party machinery/poll watchers are not "on guard" in protecting the integrity of the election?
Have you ever volunteered to work at an election precinct? Why assume that Americans who work at election sites, and tasked with the responsibility of ensuring free and fair elections, do not faithfully discharge their duties?
Have faith in your fellow Americans who screen/count the ballots. Volunteer and see for yourself.
Edit: Link added
Link: https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2020/11/20/the-voting-experience-in-2020/
(no message)
In the 2020 election, Trump won in-person voting by 71% vs. 27% for Biden. This was true even in Hawaii and Delaware (Biden's home freaking state).,
Conversely, Biden took the mail-in vote by a 3-1 rate. Even in hard-core Republican states, Biden won the mail-in vote by significant margins (60% in Arkansas and South Carolina!). There was roughly a 60-point variance between in-person voting results and mail-in results between Republican and democrat in 2020. That number in 2016? 14 points.
We all know that the pandemic increased remote voting. That doesn't explain the massive discrepancy in voting results between methods.
Democrats (see masking, see vaccines) are more weary of the virus. Hence, substantially more Democrats took advantage of in-person early voting and mail in voting. [Highly doubtful that in-person voting broke 71% for Trump. The PEW research link I posted does not support your numbers].
Polls show Republicans are substantially less trustworthy their votes will be counted, explaining why they prefer in-person same day voting.
Your argument false as you have never established any evidence that mail-in voting is less accurate. All the groundless legal challenges were swatted away by the courts.
Read Raffensperger's new book.
And if you think the pandemic is the reason for the anomalous mail-in results, you're truly willing to delude yourself of anything.
(Mind you, I know you're aware that there was fraud, and are simply lying.)
You are letting the conspiracy theorists suck you in.
New Jersey Governor's Race:
[What is interesting is that there are apparently two other categories, only one of which NBC names. With Early In Person, Mail In, and Election Day, we have 28% of the vote. And yet, 86% of the vote is in per the same web page. So, maybe 58% they just don't know how they got the votes. Confidence inducing, to be sure.]
Link: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2021-elections/new-jersey-governor-results
I'm dying to hear a rational, feasible explanation for why legitimate mail-in ballots exceed a 4-1 ratio in favor of a single party.
There's also this...in case you can't bring yourself to read WaPo ;-)...
https://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/vopp-table-18-states-with-all-mail-elections.aspx
Link: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/08/18/whats-difference-between-absentee-mail-in-voting/
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Most states are not competitive. Some are. A few are razor-thin. In a very divided country, that is pretty much what you’d expect.
I stopped reading your conspiratorial post when you said that such a thing is impossible without “outside influence.”
What bilge.
(no message)
Link: https://twitter.com/RobertCahaly/status/1455764556152717315