yours though we all know you want to mandate it for day care & schools).
in our community who will not have to get vaccinated...it would be such a relief to know beyond the shadow of a doubt...thank you, so much...Oh, and while you're at it, please identify all the kids who won't ever come in contact with another person who might be vulnerable to COVID-19.
Get real.
(no message)
let's not give COVID-19 room to grow...unless you enjoy watching pathogens thrive.
Especially for children. I'll wait....
you want to find out more...we both have equal access...but apparently not the same level of trust...that's your problem.
term side effects. Admit it is unknown.
the risks (e.g. Side Effects) and compared them with the benefits...there was unanimous approval.
BTW, in all the history of vaccines, there has never been a new, serious side effect after 6 months of widespread use, and the COVID vaccines have been distributed in the hundreds of millions of doses for nearly a year...you are looking more and more crazed the longer you push your objections....but you will always be free to voice your opinions...to fewer and fewer listeners.
study. Still waiting link boy. Or just admit that no one knows what they are.
Ty said nothing. he is a tool for the Left.
won't comprehend it...but hey, miracles do happen.
BTW, as I've said previously...due to the nature of vaccines, there aren't any "Long Term" side-effects after a few months...much less years...read the article I linked and you'll begin to understand.
Now, if you do read it and disagree, it's up to you to provide your own link that supports that position...I've done my part and won't be responding if you don't do your own work.
Link: https://www.uab.edu/news/health/item/12143-three-things-to-know-about-the-long-term-side-effects-of-covid-vaccines
negative after some time, as indicated by last 4 consecutive reports from UK.
start drinking it from a bottle
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
No vaccine, no school. Home school with the other freaks.
reshuffled thereafter. CDC politically appointed head Walenski overrode them with much pressure from the Biden admin...in an move that I cannot ever remember having happened - esp on such a clear cut result. of their chosen experts opinions.
That vote was on the booster. if you understand why they voted the booster down, you would understand the diminishing returns of a vaccine at younger ages with COVID. The same data and reasoning applies to children.
Basically, the risk of the vaccine death in the 15-19 female age group equals the risk of the COVID death (0.02%). In men 15-19, there is still a higher risk of death from COVID than vaccine (0.003% to 0.002%). Below that, younger ages didn't make sense from the standpoint of the children alone.
In children they cut the dose, but the problem is that most COVID deaths aren't dose related. Because of this, the usual benefit to risk ratio that we hope to see before recommending vaccines isn't there....but the Biden Admin wants a different result, and they are fast culling their experts.
This was why Fauci needed to go. Many professionals themselves no no longer trust these govt entities because of it. Not just me.
I am following the medical science here, while you follow your political narrative and need to not be wrong.
what the disagreement was all about...with the Delta variant now dominant, we need the boosters for vulnerable members of the population and that is what is being done...so just give your political theory machine a rest...the administration had a daunting task ahead of it with planning a rapid roll-out of the vaccines to meet the challenge of 'Delta'...give them a little credit for not "Slow Playing" their responsibilities...and you know full well why I'm being sarcastic of your chosen "Avatar"...good grief...what goes on in that mind of yours?
Link: https://www.advisory.com/daily-briefing/2021/09/01/fda-officials
review the posts on this from Aug - Oct 2021.
The Delta variant has come on very fast with serious repercussions...can we agree on that? This has required 'unusual' response times by all concerned...the CDC put a distribution plan together 'in anticipation' of a positive finding by the FDA...they didn't make their own finding...so a couple of 'by the book' FDA senior officials (very good Docs, btw) became alarmed that the CDC was sliding out of its lane. These are difficult times with several EUA's being authorized...no one got hurt as a result of any of this...let's focus on the real issues and problems and not try to make political 'Hay' like you do...incessantly. (Lot of good that admonition is going to do ;-))
...but you are being made to think there are a bunch of "little postzygotic plague rats" running around.
It's also not a good enough benefit for me to strongly push as I do the adult vaccine.
to deny it ANY possible means of survival (i.e. 'Hosts') as quickly as possible, so long as the means are judged safe...meaning vaccinations for all when the benefits are greater than risks...and thus far, for people aged 5 yrs and up, they are.
In actuality, we are headed toward a condition where the disease is "Endemic", rather than being "Eradicated"...but the strategy is the same...get EVERYONE vaccinated (as best we can)...then have several discussions as to what constitutes the right parameters for a declared 'Endemic' condition...that should occupy the Press, Pundits and Podcasters for quite awhile ;-)...I have no doubt that you'll find something to complain about, regardless of how it turns out...probably with a 'healthy dose' of politics thrown in.