More 2 + 2 = 5 from the Democrats...
Replies to: More 2 + 2 = 5 from the Democrats...
And you don't see the irony in your post - it's just magic.
O, CJ, you will be ok. Dry your eyes. Its not yr fault yr the way u are.
(no message)
Dems deny established genetic science. Anti-vaxers (1/2Dems) don't think experimental vax worth risk
That is the same to you? When you are going for whataboutism, you should at least try to make the two things similar.
With the logic of the Left, I can identify as a 6'5" Asian woman, but I can't identify as vaccinated. Basically, you reinforce my point. 2 + 2 = 5 because you say it is 5. But, 2 + 3 isn't 6 because you haven't announced that it is 6 yet. Thanks for backing up my point.
My only hope is they graduate ASAP, start working, get married & become dad/mom
This is the only path that can clean up brainwashing they had from college.
Get married? Have kids? How quaint...how conservative.
Yours is the type of antiquated, patriarchal thinking the Left is trying to suppress.
I believe for some of them (not idealogues) common sense will triumph over liberalism
They will re-recgonize 2+2 = 4 at certain age of their life.
The fact that they can't recognize that 2+2=4 now is alarming. And, no lib here will say it is 4.
The best we get is Jimbasil saying, "Oh yeah? Well...you guys do it too."
Was is the Winston Churchill quote?
If you're not a liberal at 20, you have no heart.
If you're not a conservative at 40, you have no brain.
It is true that age and experience often shed light on unsustainable liberal policies. Some will hopefully grow out of this.
I find this supremely disheartening.
Some can no longer accept simple truths.
Just like Ty unable to accept Fla having best COVID#’s.It’s about fitting their world view, not fact
(no message)
LOL...Check out the attached link that shows COVID deaths per capita...FLA is "Top 10!"
What will you do next to embarrass yourself?
BTW, while you're at it...check out where the "Blue Left Coast" states rank vs. FLA...
Link: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1109011/coronavirus-covid19-death-rates-us-by-state/
Ty is a fraud, and everybody is aware of that. He is a "shell company" for one of the board liberal
Idjits as Frankie likes to say
The fact that we have people on this board who still think Cuomo
Did a better job than DeSantis tells you every thing. I have not seen anything The Linkster has posted but I can only imagine the spin game he is putting on DeSantis.
But all those issues can at least be legitimately debated.
DeSantis Cuomo. Climate change. Covid policy and treatment. These are all subjects that can be discussed debated and argued...for or against. And I think that's healthy when devoid of childish rancor.
But to be unable to tell folks they are male or female because they "feel" like a 6'2" Asian woman who belongs in first grade is just remarkable. What did the one girl say "who am I to draw boundaries for another person?" Well you can draw a straight line from that to "minor attracted" people.
Stark, are you in favor of making homosexuality a criminal offense like it was in the U.K. when
Alan Turing was cracking the Nazi's Enigma Code and advancing computer theory?...I'm assuming the answer is no, so why can't you "expand" your thinking on such matters and accept that for those 'other people' their perceptions are reality for them...and it is not our task to find ways of antagonizing, or 'culling' them, from everyone else...rather, it's to better understand why those perceptions exist while at the same time treating them with respect as fellow human beings...is that too hard a stretch for you?
Of course not. So you do you think Jeffrey Dahmer had a unique palate?
His perception of reality was real to him! We have to make moral judgements. The insidious creep of the LGBTQ mafia was never go to stop at gay marriage. Now we're trying to normalize minor attached people. Do me a favor!
We both know the Jeffrey Dahmer reference is ridiculous...as for the LGBTQ community that has no
interest in harming anyone...if you can abide by males and females choosing to find companionship with each other, as opposed to the 'Biblical', or dare I say 'Catechetical' dictums of behavior, why can't you expand your view on other behaviors on what is clearly a spectrum?
Since these people are not in any way trying to harm others (as opposed to 'Jeff'), what are you so concerned about?...seriously...what is this "insidious creep" leading us to that is so onerous?
Because they find haven in that community.
People who advocate minor attraction are within that community. They are harbored protected and otherwise normalized within that community. If you think they have purely innocent intent I cannot help you. It is a slow incremental undermining of what is often mocked as family values. Darkness often portrays itself as light.
Who are "They"?...are "They" sexual criminals hiding out among innocent people who just happen to
have a personal challenge with their sexual identity?...sort of like "Rapists" hiding out among all the straight people?...do you have some kind of "Minority Report" means of culling them and putting them away before they can do any harm?...what's the full story here?...what's your "End Game" and means to achieve it?
What the hell are you on about?
Please point to where I advocate any of that! Jesus you're a nut job sometimes.
Tyrone, are you in favor of giving "minor attraction" legitimacy?! Not really?
(no message)
Care to answer the question I posed to Stark?...or the comments I made in my post regarding how
we should treat others?
BTW, any comments on the FLA COVID data...after reviewing my responses?...you clearly have the time.
So you won't answer Barons question about your propensity to give
"minor attraction" legitimacy? That pretty much outs you as the type of twisted individual you are. Seek help,and stay away from children for both your sakes
LOL...how about you responding to the question i posed 1st..then we can deal with your hangups.
(no message)
Ok, my answer is no. Now answer my question
(no message)
If you read my posted question to Stark, it wasn't a simple "Yes/No" request...the continuation
included this...
"I'm assuming the answer is no, so why can't you "expand" your thinking on such matters and accept that for those 'other people' their perceptions are reality for them...and it is not our task to find ways of antagonizing, or 'culling' them, from everyone else...rather, it's to better understand why those perceptions exist while at the same time treating them with respect as fellow human beings"
Therefore, I ask you...if you agree that "Homosexuality" shouldn't be outlawed, and by extension such individuals should not be discriminated against, then why can't you expand your acceptance to to others who are obviously on a 'spectrum' of sexual perception?...and as I stated above, do you agree that "We" the dominant straight community should not be striving to antagonize them, but rather to understand them while treating them with the respect every human being deserves?
HEY! No Link!!...will wonders never cease ;-).
I’m going to use it when the time comes. I’m going to identify
As vaccinated and my job won’t be able to fire me. Got to start being Woke when I need it and it benefits me.
Of course. That's what all woke policies are about.
Think Nancy really wants open in borders in her millionaires compound? No fucking way. But joe six pack better keep his mouth shut or he's a racist.
It’s funny how these people consider themselves to be intellectually superior.
(no message)