"In 2018, the Center for Investigative Reporting published evidence that the Cardinal Bea House, owned by the Jesuit order and located on Gonzaga's campus, was used by the Catholic Church as a retirement home for priests with histories of sexual predation and abuse from across the Pacific Northwest and Alaska, from the 1970s through 2016. Sexually abusive priests were quietly kept there and out of contact with vulnerable populations, while at the same time protecting the priests from any liability for the abuses they had committed. The last abusive priest moved out of the Cardinal Bea House in 2016."
Source is Wikipedia
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
I've noticed both you and the roommate do this quite often. Any counter to liberal policy is either fake or racist. Is there anything that can be critical of policy that isn't deemed as such?
(no message)
Although we may disagree politically on some things, I'd wager we have more in common than we don't. Frank as well. I'm sure we'd all break bread without incident! I mean aside for the whole English Irish thing, but that's another story :-)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
I think I have a good idea of who is a decent person and someone who's a complete ball ache.
(no message)
(no message)
Opposition is fine. But this woe is me, the world is racist against whites, we are just trying to cut down on fraud is such attention claiming BS. Give me a break, bo peep victims.
(no message)
What should happen to aged sexual predator priests, assuming they aren't/can't be put in jail? Does the Church have any responsibility for them? Should the Church just cut them loose on society? Would it matter if they become homeless while in their 70s or 80s?
It's not an easy question.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
IMHO, The Church should not continue to support these men financially.