There is actual evidence of the assault in this picture from the victim - which is actually more evidence than has been shown against Moore. Well, Dems?
Well Conor and Chris et al.? Are you a "proud democrats" who will call for him to resign also. Are you consistent?
Link: http://www.kabc.com/2017/11/16/leeann-tweeden-on-senator-al-franken/
(no message)
(no message)
I support a persons right to defend themselves when they claim innocence- esp in suspicious circumstances.
Moore has denied the allegations categorically. The accusers have provided no prrof yet. The timing is politically convenient for the Left.
the left has a history of releasing false stories and then retracting them later when they have had their effect.
(no message)
Link: https://twitter.com/MKhan47/status/931208664333144065
for the dems, it's all about the politics, not the issue.
(no message)
I am rooting for Moore to hang in there.
Consistency is hobgoblin of small minds.
......"The road to hell is paved with rationalizations".
Just because your quote allows you to smugly (and quite incorrectly) think that you don't have"a small mind" doesn't make it correct. In fact, only the smallest of minds could buy that line of thought. But it is the liberal way. You can't have consistency when you only apply the rules to others and not to yourself. Thus, you feel that you can adjust the rules as needed to fit your needs since you think that your moral high ground gives you the right.
Fuck liberalism. It is a mental disorder.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
That's your logic?!
Muwhahaha. Fucking hypocrite.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
His response is really odd considering how LeeAnn framed what happened. She says she was asleep. He said they were rehearsing a skit.
But, yeah, get him out.
ok. It's a start.
Let's get something straight. I never bought that and never will. Spouses have a duty to defend each other, above all else.
Burden of proof for shame and scandal - probably less than "beyond a reasonable doubt". (And I've said I'm not a fan of this, even with Moore).
Burden of proof for criminal conviction - "beyond a reasonable doubt".
Burden of proof to lose support of spouse - "beyond all possible doubt."
If your spouse isn't screaming for your release even after you've been convicted, you married the wrong woman.
she even coined the term herself.
Even if there is only a 5% chance that Bill was wrongly accused, someone has to be on his side. His wife has that job.
It's not her job to convince the public that the bimbos were telling the truth. There were plenty of people trying to do that. And let's not forget that shaking down companies and people for sexual harrassment settlement was a decent cottage industry at that time.
I hated Bill Clinton and every smarmy word that came out of his mouth. I hate Hillary for a multitude of reasons. I do not blame her, though, for defending her husband.
Now, Chris94 can casually throw the Clintons under the bus, and say he'll never vote for her or Bill again (you can see the smile on his face when he says it)...and then challenge us to say that about Trump. Way to take a moral stand! What changed, other than that the Clintons are now finished politically?
Ted Kennedy killed a woman and privately contacted the Soviet Union about getting help to beat Reagan in '84, and yet Kennedy was a great Democrat to the end. Can you imagine what they would have been saying about Robert Byrd if he were Republican? This is all about politics.
exception being abortion which has become their religious sacrament of evil. They are willing to drop politics for that issue, but not the others
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
"You can't change your fingerprints. You have only ten of them. And you leave them on everything you touch; they are definitely not a secret." Fingerprints, indeed.