(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Especially when the cops were convinced not to test for DD.
Considering she was still alive in that submerged car, dummy.
(no message)
I love the part where Ted, so completely distraught and concerned for her well being, at 2:45 A.M called down to the desk of the hotel he was staying at to complain about a loud party that woke him up, even though he would later testify he was up all night with worry. Another cool part was how he engaged in "casual conversation" at 7:30 the next morning with the winner of the previous day's boat race, with nary a hint of anything being amiss. He still hadn't reported the accident.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
"Try getting your facts straight." -- T3K
Keep up the good work. You are out-doing yourself. Too funny.
‘Cause you couldn’t be piling on to support Lance’s petulant “And...”? Could you?
Nah...you’re brighter than that.
I get a kick out of your posts more often than not.
But when you jump into a thread where you're digging up a corpse that's been dead for 50 years, just so that you can kick it around a bit and maybe score some political points...well, I don't see you in your best light, shall we say, and I may not respond in the most friendly fashion.
I'm just sayin'.
You're "Just sayin'"? Shoulda kept your mouth shut.
Please explain how I jumped in to score political points, dumbass? I didn't start the thread. I happened upon it and then saw Lance jumping in to counter the raising of Chappaquiddick by idiotically attempting to equate 37-year old Ted Kennedy's actions in letting one of his "Boiler Room Girls" drown with the results of a stop sign accident that was caused by a 17-year-old Laura Bush.
I gently pointed out that in Lance's breathless passionate rush to score political points (your phrase) by attempting to somehow minimize what Kennedy did by analogy, he didn't even bother to get his facts straight.
There are a million ways Lance could have responded, but he was so hot to somehow try to say "Poor Teddy wasn't alone" or "Republicans do this too", or whatever the fuck he was trying to say, that he didn't even bother with the actual facts of the incident he was so ham-handedly trying to equate. It weakened his already fatally ill-conceived point.
So, you tell me exactly how I was trying to score political points by telling him to have the consideration to get his facts right. I'd like to hear your explanation. Because I criticized Lance's delivery? Because you're protecting your "team"? Because it wasn't witty enough?
When I suggested that Lance at least get his facts straight, he doubled down with his "And...". I guess he's a champion of Fake News and above facts or acknowledging his error, so be it. I was going to let it rest there, but then you decide to chime in from the cheap seats because you feel compelled to critique God-knows-what?.
My response to Lance's utterly obnoxious reply wasn't funny enough for you? I'll get my comedy team working on it. The writers' wages will be docked.
It was a simple exchange about a mistake of fact. Lance really should have just corrected himself and moved on. That you then felt the need to jump in is world-class display of technicolor dipshittery.
So, explain how his facts were right and then...explain how telling him to get his facts straight is "political", otherwise shut your pie hole. Better yet don't explain...because too much time has been wasted on your inanity already...
Now THIS I've got to see!
A fact from a liberal is anything that can be used to deflect from the point. Look at the nitwits who now want justice for slick Willie...decades later, in the hopes they can also bring down our beloved POTUS. Disingenuous. Traitorous. Liberal.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
to drown. What did Teddy do but wait on the bank for 15 minutes, call no one, walk past at least 4 cottages with people inside, still call no one, fail to tell his hotel manager, and not contact authorites until 10 hours later until he sobered up.
Dems never held Teddy accountable because they have no principles.