changed his findings about Hillary.
This story is important on three fronts:
1) Comey richly deserved to be fired
2) Proof exists now even without Hillary's server that she violated the law with Top Secret information making it's way to unauthorized computers.
3) Further evidence that the DOJ was corrupt in it's handling of the Hillary email scandal, and this deserves an investigation.
(BTW, losing the election is not "punishment" for crimes committed by Hillary. The precedents set by Comey and the other corrupt DOJ officials cannot be allowed to stand).
Link: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/12/29/state-department-releases-huma-abedin-emails-found-on-anthony-weiners-laptop.html
(no message)
The FBI started an investigation of the Trump campaign all the way back in the spring of 2016. Based on this conversation between Georgie boy and this Australian diplomat, who then took it to American authorities.
Pretty interesting none of this was made public or leaked to the press, especially from all those Clintonites in the FBI, wouldn't you say? I feel like a NYT story about the FBI investigating the campaign for counter intelligence--who was benefitting from stolen, leaked emails on American citizens by a foreign adversary on a daily basis from October to election day--would have been a pretty big deal.
But, no one said anything.
I'm starting to think this rogue deep state FBI is all a bunch of malarky, peddled in bad faith by a bunch of people who know better.
First a correction: The Trump investigation began in mid 2016 on the basis of the false Dossier.
Now, as to why this wasn't leaked to the press as everything else was after the election. Consider:
Obama himself has already been proven to have been tipped off as to the DNC hack, but did nothing to the Russians for months - in fact he only issued a reprimand and symbolic sanctions in the very end stage of his lame duck session. So why was that?
Answer: He didn't think it that unusual given the past history of both the US and Russia wrt each other's elections.
He knew there was heavy dirt on both Hillary and the Dems, and he didn't want it exposed.
He had not yet sen the drip/drip/drip techniques that Wikileaks used to roast Hillary.
He knew there was collusion between the Clinton's and Russia (and many other countries), and he didn't want that coming out. He never expected that Hillary would lose, and thus wanted to keep things under wraps if at all possible.
Now, AFTER the election, they had a meeting where it was decided to simply accuse Trump of their own sins. To this day, there is only evidence of Clinton/Russia collusion wrt The Dossier (where Clinton and the DNC paid Fusion GPS to in turn pay Russia to leak a fictional Dossier on Trump as "an insurance policy as mentioned in Strzok's email), and wrt the Uranium One deal which resulted in a huge cash donation to the Clinton Foundation in exchange for 20% of the US uranium supply.
Since the MSM is literally the Pravda mouthpiece of the democratic party, and because Obama did not want this information coming to light when he had no doubts about Hillary winning the election, he simply didn't instruct that the information be released by the complicit press. We already saw in the Wikileaks how major NYT writers ran their articles by John podesta for approval. No story like this would ever be written, much less published without the approval of the Dem Party first.
It was only after the election, that the Deep State leakers cared about leaking anything (anything that would hurt Trump), or the MSM cared anything about actually doing investigative reporting - well ok, they still don't really do that, they just make up Fake News - but you get my drift.
(no message)
I'd say that i am the bigger man, but I don't think that I need to state the obvious.
Regarding your NYT story which is now drumming across the CNN airwaves, let's give this 48 hours to see if it isn't more Fake News.
And to my credit I did direct you to your preferred sources, although the Breitbart recommendation was more of a joke.
As for the opening sentence of this particular post, in my experience, the man who feels the need to say he's the bigger man, is not in fact the bigger man.
I'd also note the 48 hour rule didn't apply to the link your original post, but I'm fine to wait.
Why would any US President roll over and play dead, given the overwhelming and undisputed evidence of Russian cyber warfare perpetrated against the United States?
there are many possible answers to either your question or mine. In fact one of those answers could be that they did in fact do this, but it is not being reported by your (or my) biased news sources.
But I will play..........if your assertion is true.....
...my guess is that Trump knows that he didn't collude with Russia, so he thinks it is all B.S. so why waste time on it? The idea that $100,000 spent of Facebook ads in the week leading up to the election would sway an election and convince people who were Hillary voters to now vote for Trump is ludicrous also.
....also, it is my guess that Obama never thought Hillary was going to lose, and didn't feel any pressing need to address what he thought was a minor issue (or he knew there was serious dirt in the emails, and he wanted to let sleeping dogs lie until after the election, when all of his corrupt DOJ and FBI heads (the suits, not the boots) could cover the tracks.
President Obama also issued sanctions against Russia, as the evidence began to unfold. He did not recklessly divulge classified intelligence in the waning weeks of the campaign.
The evidence is now conclusive and reveals the vast extent of the cyber warfare. Trump has yet to embrace the intelligence or the evidence, deferring to Putin’s strong denial that Russia did so.
Trump is a Russian asset. Fact.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
lipstick on that pig.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
There is an email that specifically defined his work as a volunteer. He should take responsibility for what he did that wasn't assigned to him.
Please stop.
(no message)
Even though Obama fired him.
No, I dont believe Trump. I do, however, believe the picture of Papa sitting at a conference table with a trump and pence during a foreign affairs discussion.
(no message)
(no message)
Whereas Trump gets a special counsel.
Some were marked Confidential.
Confidential
Secret
Top Secret
Top Secret/Compartmentalized
Do some research on when anyone was jailed over mishandling Confidential information.
This is a PARTIAL release of what was on Weiner’s Lap top which the Feds dragged their feet over for a year to release. At the time just before the election, Comey’s statements were widely inferred by the MSM to indicate that the whole Weiner email story was a political attack with no substance. These emails confirm that there was at least substance to the story of further irresponsibility.
I await the rest of the emails to be released too because at this point of then FBI’s resistance to transparency, they cannot be trusted. They ignore the subpoena’s of the House Intel committee, they resist FOIA requests which they are mandated to obey, and they refuse to answer if the FBI paid for the Dossier or whether it was the “evidence” used to justify the FISA warrant against Trump Campaign. They also have admitted this past week that they never vetted the Dossier before sending it up the ladder - a revelation that highlights the hyper partisanship of the FBI and many of the members now on Mueller’s team.
Link: https://news.vice.com/article/exclusive-hillary-clinton-exchanged-classified-emails-on-private-server-with-three-aides
(no message)