Rosenstein – Republican, appointed by Trump.
Sessions – Republican, appointed by Trump.
Wray – Republican, appointed by Trump.
Coats – Republican, appointed by Trump.
Mueller – Republican, appointed by Rosenstein.
All, somehow, favoring the Democrats.
Democracy dies down one road. I hope we choose the other...but, just based on the ability for Trump cultists to believe whatever he tells them, it does not look good.
The president has the right by law to fire any of these guys if they were involved ( your list is hyperbolic),
And that is what the constitution allows,
I also want anyone falsifying a FISA application sent to prison
You wouldn't know the rule of law on your best day.
If you did, you'd want Trump, his family, and most of his administration sent away for years.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Rosenstein – Republican, appointed by Trump.
Sessions – Republican, appointed by Trump.
Wray – Republican, appointed by Trump.
Coats – Republican, appointed by Trump.
Mueller – Republican, appointed by Rosenstein.
(no message)
(no message)
Now more than ever.
(no message)
You really think that our current leader believes in civil liberties? Fool.
are above the law, there is a problem. We are over a year into his presidency, and you still don't get it. The people spoke; they don't like the way the government has been managed.
63m voted for Hillary. 60m voted for Trump. The majority voted for Obama against McCain and Romney. Most believe Gore got more votes than Bush.
I think you missed that.
(no message)
by - the DNC and Clinton campaign."
I did not choose a demagogue. You did.
(no message)
Dunno if that is true, but we need to find out.
Are they precluded from drafting search warrants seeking evidence to uncover such criminal behavior?
If this is the best they got, the Orange Don has some serious issues.
Under Franks, evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant must be suppressed when the defendant shows by a preponderance of the evidence that (1) the affidavit in support of the warrant contains false statements or misleading omissions, (2) the false statements or omissions were made deliberately or with reckless disregard for the truth, and (3) probable cause would not have existed without the false statements and/or omissions.
Even assuming arguendo that #1 and #2 are met (tough threshold), #3 is often the toughest hurdle for a defendant seeking to suppress evidence obtained from a warrant.
So, without seeing the entire four corners of the FISA warrants related to Carter Page, it is hard to say whether they would pass muster.
My understanding is that the FBI and Schiff see it much differently than the insinuations made in the Nunes memo.